Twenty Constructionist Things to Do With Data Science

Building on Seymour Papert and Cynthia Solomon’s 1971 memo on “Twenty Things to Do with a Computer,” we consider burgeoning areas of data science as a context to affirm and extend constructionist tenets concerning the power of material production in learning. Like Papert and Solomon’s original treatise about computing, our considerations are motivated by the reality that much of the developmental and learning benefits of engaging with data remain out of reach for youth. Consistent with their argument, we suggest this is not because of any requisite complexity or skill but because education fields appear reluctant to progress toward more generative stances about what it means to learn from material features of data, which are distinctly emphasized in data science. The twenty things we highlight include a variety of topic contexts and epistemic pathways learners can pursue when engaging with data as material for generative inquiry and production. The things are meant to highlight what data materiality means from a constructionist viewpoint – and how data as a science might help us nuance these conceptualizations. This includes more critical consideration of the myriad ways material production fruitfully reflects learner priorities and, consequently, the social and cultural tensions accompanying outcomes. We discuss these observations in terms of their implications for constructionism and learning.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Constructionism Conference Proceedings
Published
2025-06-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21240/constr/2025/95.x
Primary Topic
Online Learning and Analytics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Twenty Constructionist Things to Do With Data Science

Justice T. Walker, Emmanuel Schanzer
Constructionism Conference Proceedings
Online Learning and Analytics
article

Twenty Constructionist Things to Do With Data Science

Justice T. Walker, Emmanuel Schanzer
article en

Abstract

Building on Seymour Papert and Cynthia Solomon’s 1971 memo on “Twenty Things to Do with a Computer,” we consider burgeoning areas of data science as a context to affirm and extend constructionist tenets concerning the power of material production in learning. Like Papert and Solomon’s original treatise about computing, our considerations are motivated by the reality that much of the developmental and learning benefits of engaging with data remain out of reach for youth. Consistent with their argument, we suggest this is not because of any requisite complexity or skill but because education fields appear reluctant to progress toward more generative stances about what it means to learn from material features of data, which are distinctly emphasized in data science. The twenty things we highlight include a variety of topic contexts and epistemic pathways learners can pursue when engaging with data as material for generative inquiry and production. The things are meant to highlight what data materiality means from a constructionist viewpoint – and how data as a science might help us nuance these conceptualizations. This includes more critical consideration of the myriad ways material production fruitfully reflects learner priorities and, consequently, the social and cultural tensions accompanying outcomes. We discuss these observations in terms of their implications for constructionism and learning.

Constructionism Conference ProceedingsVol. 8
University of Maryland, College Park (US)
National Science Foundation
Openalex Percentile: Top 85%
Online Learning and Analytics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.