Target controlled vs. manually controlled infusion of propofol for sedation during transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt procedure: a randomized controlled trial

Background & objective: Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) is used to form a tract between the portal and the hepatic veins, with a metallic stent bridged through the hepatic parenchyma for patients who have chronic liver disease causing multisystem physiological disruption. The purpose of this study was to compare the quality of sedation in the radiology suit during TIPS procedure with propofol using target-controlled infusion (TCI) versus manual infusion. Methodology: This prospective study enrolled 78 ASA II patients, scheduled for TIPS procedure, who were randomly allocated into two equal groups; TCI group to have sedation with propofol guided with TCI system, and MCI group (manual infusion group) received propofol manually. We aimed primarily to study the effectiveness of TCI in sedation for TIPS procedure regarding SedLine levels and sedation-related complications, while the secondary outcomes were to evaluate the amount of total propofol consumption, the recovery time, with recording the patient and interventional radiologist satisfaction. Results: There were statistically highly significant higher SedLine readings in the MCI group at times of venography and balloon dilation compared to TCI group respectively (P < 0.001). The TCI group showed more stable hemodynamics when compared to MCI group. While there was highly significant lower result in the TCI than MCI group regarding propofol dose (589.6 ± 174.9 vs. 711.6 ± 53.3 mg) and Recovery time (12.9 ± 3.9 vs. 18.3 ± 4.5 min; P < 0.0010) respectively. Also, the TCI group showed more patient and radiologist satisfaction scores. Conclusion: Target-controlled infusion achieved more effective sedation for transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt procedure, with less propofol consumption, and less sedation related complications. Target-controlled infusion had better patient and interventional radiologist satisfaction when compared to manually controlled infusion. Key words: Chronic Liver Disease; Propofol; Target Control Infusion; Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt Procedure Citation: Elshafie MA, Salem MA, Ghoniem AM, Abdelrahman AI. Target controlled vs. manually controlled infusion of propofol for sedation during transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt procedure: a randomized controlled trial. Anaesth. pain intensive care 2025;29(3):403-410. DOI: 10.35975/apic.v29i3.2754 Received: January 04, 2025; Revised: March 14, 2025; Accepted: March 29, 2025

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Anaesthesia Pain & Intensive Care
Published
2025-04-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.35975/apic.v29i3.2754
Primary Topic
Liver Disease and Transplantation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Target controlled vs. manually controlled infusion of propofol for sedation during transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt procedure: a randomized controlled trial

Minatallah Ali Elshafie, M. R. SALEM, Aya Esmail Farag Ghoniem, A Abdelrahman
1 links
Anaesthesia Pain & Intensive Care
Liver Disease and Transplantation
article

Target controlled vs. manually controlled infusion of propofol for sedation during transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt procedure: a randomized controlled trial

Minatallah Ali Elshafie, M. R. SALEM, Aya Esmail Farag Ghoniem, A Abdelrahman
article en

Abstract

Background & objective: Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) is used to form a tract between the portal and the hepatic veins, with a metallic stent bridged through the hepatic parenchyma for patients who have chronic liver disease causing multisystem physiological disruption. The purpose of this study was to compare the quality of sedation in the radiology suit during TIPS procedure with propofol using target-controlled infusion (TCI) versus manual infusion. Methodology: This prospective study enrolled 78 ASA II patients, scheduled for TIPS procedure, who were randomly allocated into two equal groups; TCI group to have sedation with propofol guided with TCI system, and MCI group (manual infusion group) received propofol manually. We aimed primarily to study the effectiveness of TCI in sedation for TIPS procedure regarding SedLine levels and sedation-related complications, while the secondary outcomes were to evaluate the amount of total propofol consumption, the recovery time, with recording the patient and interventional radiologist satisfaction. Results: There were statistically highly significant higher SedLine readings in the MCI group at times of venography and balloon dilation compared to TCI group respectively (P < 0.001). The TCI group showed more stable hemodynamics when compared to MCI group. While there was highly significant lower result in the TCI than MCI group regarding propofol dose (589.6 ± 174.9 vs. 711.6 ± 53.3 mg) and Recovery time (12.9 ± 3.9 vs. 18.3 ± 4.5 min; P < 0.0010) respectively. Also, the TCI group showed more patient and radiologist satisfaction scores. Conclusion: Target-controlled infusion achieved more effective sedation for transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt procedure, with less propofol consumption, and less sedation related complications. Target-controlled infusion had better patient and interventional radiologist satisfaction when compared to manually controlled infusion. Key words: Chronic Liver Disease; Propofol; Target Control Infusion; Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt Procedure Citation: Elshafie MA, Salem MA, Ghoniem AM, Abdelrahman AI. Target controlled vs. manually controlled infusion of propofol for sedation during transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt procedure: a randomized controlled trial. Anaesth. pain intensive care 2025;29(3):403-410. DOI: 10.35975/apic.v29i3.2754 Received: January 04, 2025; Revised: March 14, 2025; Accepted: March 29, 2025

Anaesthesia Pain & Intensive CareVol. 29(3)
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Liver Disease and Transplantation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.