Comparative study of the effects of volume-controlled ventilation vs. pressure-controlled volume guaranteed ventilation in patients with obesity during laparoscopic surgery

Background & objective: The anesthetists have been experimenting with different modes of mechanical ventilation during general anesthesia. The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of Pressure Controlled Ventilation-Volume Guaranteed (PCV-VG) mode in comparison to volume-controlled ventilation (VCV) mode in obese patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery in the Trendelenburg position, with a focus on their lung compliance and Oxygenation Index (OI). Methodology: This randomized controlled clinical trial involved 64 obese patients of both sexes, with a Body Mass Index (BMI) of ≥30 kg/m², and classified as American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class I or II. The participants were randomly assigned to one of the two groups: the study group (Group P) using PCV-VG and the control group (Group V) using VCV. Hemodynamic and respiratory parameters were monitored. Results: The arterial oxygen partial pressure (PaO2) and lung compliance were significantly higher in Group P compared to Group V (P < 0.05). Conversely, the peak pressure (P peak) and plateau pressure (Pplat) along with the mean pressure (P mean) as well as the OI were significantly lower in Group P compared to Group V (P < 0.05). Conclusion: PCV-VG significantly improves lung compliance and oxygenation while maintaining lower peak and plateau pressures, with comparable hemodynamic stability and PaCO2 levels. Abbreviations: BMI: Body Mass Index, OI: Oxygenation Index, PCV-VG: Pressure Controlled Ventilation-Volume Guaranteed, PIP: Peak Inspiratory Pressure, PRVC- pressure-regulated volume-controlled, VT: tidal volume, VCV: volume-controlled ventilation Keywords: Volume-Controlled Ventilation; Pressure-Controlled Ventilation Volume-Guaranteed; Trendelenburg Position; Obesity; Airway Pressures Citation: Soliman AM, El Seidy MI, Taha SS, El Agamy AES, Youssef AM. Comparative study of the effects of volume-controlled ventilation vs. pressure-controlled volume guaranteed ventilation in patients with obesity during laparoscopic surgery. Anaesth. pain intensive care 2025;29(2):318-324. DOI: 10.35975/apic.v29i2.2722 Received: September 02, 2024; Reviewed: October 23, 2024; Accepted: January 01, 2025

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Anaesthesia Pain & Intensive Care
Published
2025-04-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.35975/apic.v29i2.2722
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Abdominal Surgery and Complications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.52
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative study of the effects of volume-controlled ventilation vs. pressure-controlled volume guaranteed ventilation in patients with obesity during laparoscopic surgery

Ashraf El Sayed El Agamy, Ahmed M. Youssef, Sameh Salem Hefni Taha, Ahmed M. Soliman et al.
1 citations
Anaesthesia Pain & Intensive Care
Abdominal Surgery and Complications
1.52
article

Comparative study of the effects of volume-controlled ventilation vs. pressure-controlled volume guaranteed ventilation in patients with obesity during laparoscopic surgery

Ashraf El Sayed El Agamy, Ahmed M. Youssef, Sameh Salem Hefni Taha, Ahmed M. Soliman, Mohamed Ismail El Seidy
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Background & objective: The anesthetists have been experimenting with different modes of mechanical ventilation during general anesthesia. The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of Pressure Controlled Ventilation-Volume Guaranteed (PCV-VG) mode in comparison to volume-controlled ventilation (VCV) mode in obese patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery in the Trendelenburg position, with a focus on their lung compliance and Oxygenation Index (OI). Methodology: This randomized controlled clinical trial involved 64 obese patients of both sexes, with a Body Mass Index (BMI) of ≥30 kg/m², and classified as American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class I or II. The participants were randomly assigned to one of the two groups: the study group (Group P) using PCV-VG and the control group (Group V) using VCV. Hemodynamic and respiratory parameters were monitored. Results: The arterial oxygen partial pressure (PaO2) and lung compliance were significantly higher in Group P compared to Group V (P < 0.05). Conversely, the peak pressure (P peak) and plateau pressure (Pplat) along with the mean pressure (P mean) as well as the OI were significantly lower in Group P compared to Group V (P < 0.05). Conclusion: PCV-VG significantly improves lung compliance and oxygenation while maintaining lower peak and plateau pressures, with comparable hemodynamic stability and PaCO2 levels. Abbreviations: BMI: Body Mass Index, OI: Oxygenation Index, PCV-VG: Pressure Controlled Ventilation-Volume Guaranteed, PIP: Peak Inspiratory Pressure, PRVC- pressure-regulated volume-controlled, VT: tidal volume, VCV: volume-controlled ventilation Keywords: Volume-Controlled Ventilation; Pressure-Controlled Ventilation Volume-Guaranteed; Trendelenburg Position; Obesity; Airway Pressures Citation: Soliman AM, El Seidy MI, Taha SS, El Agamy AES, Youssef AM. Comparative study of the effects of volume-controlled ventilation vs. pressure-controlled volume guaranteed ventilation in patients with obesity during laparoscopic surgery. Anaesth. pain intensive care 2025;29(2):318-324. DOI: 10.35975/apic.v29i2.2722 Received: September 02, 2024; Reviewed: October 23, 2024; Accepted: January 01, 2025

Anaesthesia Pain & Intensive CareVol. 29(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Abdominal Surgery and Complications
1.52
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.