Decentring European Foreign Policy Analysis: Towards a Paradigmatic Shift

Abstract The article argues that considering Eurocentrism as a meta‐paradigm helps scholars to be conscious about assumptions, simplifications and distortions that undermine scholars' abilities to analyse European foreign policy. The article integrates several conceptualisations of decentring that originate from both postcolonial and more mainstream scholarship. It explains how analytical limitations and simplifications can be overcome through various interrelated stages of a decentring approach, whilst avoiding recentring or merely ‘decentring by addition’. The article concludes by arguing for a widening of ‘allyship in diversity’ – not only amongst but also beyond critical approaches – by reaching out to more mainstream scholarship in order to increase the prospect of a paradigm shift in the analysis of European foreign policy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JCMS Journal of Common Market Studies
Published
2025-06-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.13766
Citations
2
Primary Topic
European Union Policy and Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
17.04

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Decentring European Foreign Policy Analysis: Towards a Paradigmatic Shift

Stephan Keukeleire, Sharon Lecocq
2 citations
JCMS Journal of Common Market Studies
European Union Policy and Governance
17.04
article

Decentring European Foreign Policy Analysis: Towards a Paradigmatic Shift

Stephan Keukeleire, Sharon Lecocq
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract The article argues that considering Eurocentrism as a meta‐paradigm helps scholars to be conscious about assumptions, simplifications and distortions that undermine scholars' abilities to analyse European foreign policy. The article integrates several conceptualisations of decentring that originate from both postcolonial and more mainstream scholarship. It explains how analytical limitations and simplifications can be overcome through various interrelated stages of a decentring approach, whilst avoiding recentring or merely ‘decentring by addition’. The article concludes by arguing for a widening of ‘allyship in diversity’ – not only amongst but also beyond critical approaches – by reaching out to more mainstream scholarship in order to increase the prospect of a paradigm shift in the analysis of European foreign policy.

JCMS Journal of Common Market StudiesVol. 63(5)
KU Leuven (BE)
KU Leuven
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
European Union Policy and Governance
17.04
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.