Critical Thinking in Science Learning: Systematic Literature Review

Critical thinking is a vital intellectual skill that enables informed judgments through the analysis of information. Its development in educational settings is essential, particularly in science learning, where analytical reasoning and problem-solving are fundamental. This study aims to analyze Scopus-indexed journal articles (Q1–Q4) that investigate critical thinking in science education. A systematic literature review process was employed to examine 57 empirical papers, encompassing three primary stages: planning, conducting, and reporting. The analysis examined research areas, subject fields, participants, data collection tools, and research methods. The results indicated that most studies employed a quantitative approach, with high school students from medium-sized schools as the primary participants. Essay tests were the most commonly used instruments for measuring critical thinking. The primary research emphasis was on creating and assessing instructional materials, particularly within the realm of physics education. These findings reveal current trends and research gaps, particularly in underexplored topics such as cross-disciplinary integration and assessment strategies. This study contributes to science education by mapping the current research landscape of critical thinking and providing insights that inform future investigations, curriculum design, and instructional innovation.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Jurnal Pemberdayaan Masyarakat
Published
2025-06-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.46843/jpm.v4i1.378
Primary Topic
Education and Critical Thinking Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Critical Thinking in Science Learning: Systematic Literature Review

Parlindungan Sinaga, Winny Liliawati, Santri Ramadani
Jurnal Pemberdayaan Masyarakat
Education and Critical Thinking Development
article

Critical Thinking in Science Learning: Systematic Literature Review

Parlindungan Sinaga, Winny Liliawati, Santri Ramadani
article en

Abstract

Critical thinking is a vital intellectual skill that enables informed judgments through the analysis of information. Its development in educational settings is essential, particularly in science learning, where analytical reasoning and problem-solving are fundamental. This study aims to analyze Scopus-indexed journal articles (Q1–Q4) that investigate critical thinking in science education. A systematic literature review process was employed to examine 57 empirical papers, encompassing three primary stages: planning, conducting, and reporting. The analysis examined research areas, subject fields, participants, data collection tools, and research methods. The results indicated that most studies employed a quantitative approach, with high school students from medium-sized schools as the primary participants. Essay tests were the most commonly used instruments for measuring critical thinking. The primary research emphasis was on creating and assessing instructional materials, particularly within the realm of physics education. These findings reveal current trends and research gaps, particularly in underexplored topics such as cross-disciplinary integration and assessment strategies. This study contributes to science education by mapping the current research landscape of critical thinking and providing insights that inform future investigations, curriculum design, and instructional innovation.

Jurnal Pemberdayaan MasyarakatVol. 4(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 84%
Education and Critical Thinking Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.