Research on the Construction of a Kirkpatrick Model-Based Evaluation System for Ideological and Political Education in Medical Professional Courses
目的:在“健康中国”战略背景下,探索医学人文素养培育的创新路径,解决当前医学教育中技能本位倾向导致的人文价值理念内化不足问题。方法:以杭州医学院临床医学专业学生为研究对象,基于柯氏四级评估理论构建四维评价体系,整合“行医故事”主题资源库与智能教育平台,开展混合式思政教育实践。建立医学人文教育效能评估体系,采用问卷调查、量表测评(反应层、学习层、行为层、效果层),纵向追踪教学成效。结果:总效能指标达46.22/50 (92.4%),证实该模式有效促进人文素养内化。结论:“医学叙事 + 量化评价”模式有效贯通专业技能与人文价值培养,促进职业价值观的立体化内化与行为转化,为医学思政教育提供系统性解决方案。未来需强化临床动态追踪机制,推动人文素养培育与职业发展的全周期融合。Objective: Under the strategic backdrop of “Healthy China”, this study explores innovative approaches to cultivating medical humanistic literacy, addressing the insufficient internalization of humanistic values caused by the current skill-oriented tendency in medical education. Methods: Targeting clinical medicine students at Hangzhou Medical College, a four-dimensional evaluation system was constructed based on Kirkpatrick’s Four-Level Evaluation Model. A blended ideological-political education approach was implemented, integrating a thematic “Physicians’ Narratives” resource database with an intelligent education platform. A medical humanities education efficacy assessment system was established, employing questionnaires and scale evaluations (reaction, learning, behavior, and results levels) to longitudinally track teaching outcomes. Results: The overall efficacy index reached 46.22/50 (92.4%), demonstrating that this model effectively enhances the internalization of humanistic literacy. Conclusion: The “Medical Narrative + Quantitative Evaluation” model successfully bridges professional skills training with humanistic value cultivation, facilitating the multidimensional internalization and behavioral transformation of professional values. It provides a systematic solution for ideological-political education in medicine. Future efforts should strengthen dynamic clinical tracking mechanisms to promote the lifelong integration of humanistic literacy cultivation and career development.
Authors
- 洪杰 李
Publication Details
- Journal
- Advances in Education
- Published
- 2025-01-01
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.12677/ae.2025.1561052
- Citations
- 2
- Primary Topic
- Ideological and Political Education
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 17.85