A Study of Engagement Strategies under Polyphony Theory in Civil Judgments of Medical Disputes’ Interpretation Process—Based on 10 Medical Service Contract Dispute Judgments

民事判决书具有其特定的人际功能，其人际意义可以通过不同的介入策略说理来体现。通过定量统计医疗服务合同纠纷民事判决书中的介入资源，可以发现法院对医疗服务合同纠纷的说理介入模式，并发掘医疗服务合同纠纷判决书对医患冲突的人际调节功能，体会其中的人本情怀和社会关切。研究此类民事判决书的介入资源，一方面可以为之后判决书的释法说理提供话语策略、价值引导策略，另一方面可为缓解医患冲突，维护社会和谐稳定提供话语实践参考。Civil judgments possess significant interpersonal functions, and their interpersonal meanings can be reflected through various engagement strategies in the judgements’ interpretation process. By analyzing the engagement resources within civil judgments related to medical service contract disputes, aiming to identify the patterns of engagement in its interpretation employed by the courts in such disputes and to explore the interpersonal functions of these judgments in meditating the conflicts between the doctor and patient. This study reveals the social concerns of humanity embedded within these judgments. On one hand, it can provide discourse strategies and value-guiding strategies for the interpretation in the subsequent judgments; on the other hand, it can offer practical discourse references for alleviating doctor-patient conflicts and maintaining social harmony and stability.