AI_TAF: A Human-Centric Trustworthiness Risk Assessment Framework for AI Systems

This paper presents the AI Trustworthiness Assessment Framework (AI_TAF), a comprehensive methodology for evaluating and mitigating trustworthiness risks across all stages of an AI system’s lifecycle. The framework accounts for the criticality of the system based on its intended application, the maturity level of the AI teams responsible for ensuring trust, and the organisation’s risk tolerance regarding trustworthiness. By integrating both technical safeguards and sociopsychological considerations, AI_TAF adopts a human-centric approach to risk management, supporting the development of trustworthy AI systems across diverse organisational contexts and at varying levels of human–AI maturity. Crucially, the framework underscores that achieving trust in AI requires a rigorous assessment and advancement of the trustworthiness maturity of the human actors involved in the AI lifecycle. Only through this human-centric enhancement can AI teams be adequately prepared to provide effective oversight of AI systems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Computers
Published
2025-06-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/computers14070243
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.73

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

AI_TAF: A Human-Centric Trustworthiness Risk Assessment Framework for AI Systems

Eleni Seralidou, Theofanis Fotis, Nineta Polemi, Kitty Kioskli
2 citations
Computers
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
4.73
article

AI_TAF: A Human-Centric Trustworthiness Risk Assessment Framework for AI Systems

Eleni Seralidou, Theofanis Fotis, Nineta Polemi, Kitty Kioskli
article en
2 citations

Abstract

This paper presents the AI Trustworthiness Assessment Framework (AI_TAF), a comprehensive methodology for evaluating and mitigating trustworthiness risks across all stages of an AI system’s lifecycle. The framework accounts for the criticality of the system based on its intended application, the maturity level of the AI teams responsible for ensuring trust, and the organisation’s risk tolerance regarding trustworthiness. By integrating both technical safeguards and sociopsychological considerations, AI_TAF adopts a human-centric approach to risk management, supporting the development of trustworthy AI systems across diverse organisational contexts and at varying levels of human–AI maturity. Crucially, the framework underscores that achieving trust in AI requires a rigorous assessment and advancement of the trustworthiness maturity of the human actors involved in the AI lifecycle. Only through this human-centric enhancement can AI teams be adequately prepared to provide effective oversight of AI systems.

ComputersVol. 14(7)
University of Piraeus (GR), University of Brighton (GB)
European Commission
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
4.73
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.