Ethicametrics: A New Interdisciplinary Science

This paper characterises Ethicametrics (EM) as a new interdisciplinary scientific research area focusing on metrics of ethics (MOE) and ethics of metrics (EOM), by providing a comprehensive methodological framework. EM is scientific: it is based on behavioural mathematical modelling to be statistically validated and tested, with additional sensitivity analyses to favour immediate interpretations. EM is interdisciplinary: it spans from less to more traditional fields, with essential mutual improvements. EM is new: valid and invalid examples of EM (articles referring to an explicit and an implicit behavioural model, respectively) are scarce, recent, time-stable and discipline-focused, with 1 and 37 scientists, respectively. Thus, the core of EM (multi-level statistical analyses applied to behavioural mathematical models) is crucial to avoid biased MOE and EOM. Conversely, articles inside EM should study quantitatively any metrics or ethics, in any alternative context, at any analytical level, by using panel/longitudinal data. Behavioural models should be ethically explicit, possibly by evaluating ethics in terms of the consequences of actions. Ethical measures should be scientifically grounded by evaluating metrics in terms of ethical criteria coming from the relevant theological/philosophical literature. Note that behavioural models applied to science metrics can be used to deduce social consequences to be ethically evaluated.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Stats
Published
2025-06-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/stats8030050
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Ethics in Business and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.17
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Ethicametrics: A New Interdisciplinary Science

Fabio Zagonari
1 citations
Stats
Ethics in Business and Education
4.17
article

Ethicametrics: A New Interdisciplinary Science

Fabio Zagonari
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This paper characterises Ethicametrics (EM) as a new interdisciplinary scientific research area focusing on metrics of ethics (MOE) and ethics of metrics (EOM), by providing a comprehensive methodological framework. EM is scientific: it is based on behavioural mathematical modelling to be statistically validated and tested, with additional sensitivity analyses to favour immediate interpretations. EM is interdisciplinary: it spans from less to more traditional fields, with essential mutual improvements. EM is new: valid and invalid examples of EM (articles referring to an explicit and an implicit behavioural model, respectively) are scarce, recent, time-stable and discipline-focused, with 1 and 37 scientists, respectively. Thus, the core of EM (multi-level statistical analyses applied to behavioural mathematical models) is crucial to avoid biased MOE and EOM. Conversely, articles inside EM should study quantitatively any metrics or ethics, in any alternative context, at any analytical level, by using panel/longitudinal data. Behavioural models should be ethically explicit, possibly by evaluating ethics in terms of the consequences of actions. Ethical measures should be scientifically grounded by evaluating metrics in terms of ethical criteria coming from the relevant theological/philosophical literature. Note that behavioural models applied to science metrics can be used to deduce social consequences to be ethically evaluated.

StatsVol. 8(3)
University of Bologna (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Ethics in Business and Education
4.17
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.