A Comparative Analysis of Root Canal Preparation Methods: Assessing Obturation Quality in Rotary Versus Manual Techniques

Objective: To compare the radiographic quality of root canal obturation in molar teeth prepared using rotary and manual instrumentation techniques performed by undergraduate dental students. Study Design: Cross-sectional analytical study. Place and Duration of Study: This study was conducted at the College of Dentistry, Qassim University, Saudi Arabia, from August 21, 2024, to March 10, 2025. Methods: A total of 60 digital periapical radiographs of molars were retrospectively allocated into two groups based on the root canal instrumentation techniques. Group 1 (n=30): manual stainless-steel files using step-back technique and Group 2 (n=30): Pro Taper Gold (PTG) rotary nickel-titanium (NiTi) files using crown-down technique. All canals were obturated using cold lateral condensation with AH Plus sealer and appropriate gutta-percha points. The quality of obturation was assessed based on three parameters: length, density, and taper. A T-score (0–3) was calculated for each case. Statistical analysis was performed using Chi-square and Mann-Whitney U tests, with a p-value < 0.05 considered statistically significant. Results: Adequate obturation in terms of length, density, and taper was observed in 63.33%, 46.67%, and 36.67% of teeth in the manual group, and in 83.33%, 90%, and 93.33% of teeth in the rotary group, respectively. Statistically significant differences were found in all three parameters between the two groups (p < 0.05 for length; p < 0.001 for density and taper). The overall T-score distribution also showed a significant difference favoring the rotary technique (p < 0.001). No statistically significant associations were observed between obturation quality and either gender or tooth location within the arch (p > 0.05). Conclusion: Rotary instrumentation resulted in significantly better radiographic quality of root canal obturation compared to manual techniques. These findings support the integration of rotary systems into undergraduate endodontic training to enhance treatment outcomes.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Medical Forum Monthly
Published
2025-06-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.60110/medforum.360512
Primary Topic
Endodontics and Root Canal Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Comparative Analysis of Root Canal Preparation Methods: Assessing Obturation Quality in Rotary Versus Manual Techniques

Muhammad Zubair Ahmad, Yazeed Sulaiman Alqowaiei
Medical Forum Monthly
Endodontics and Root Canal Treatments
article

A Comparative Analysis of Root Canal Preparation Methods: Assessing Obturation Quality in Rotary Versus Manual Techniques

Muhammad Zubair Ahmad, Yazeed Sulaiman Alqowaiei
article en

Abstract

Objective: To compare the radiographic quality of root canal obturation in molar teeth prepared using rotary and manual instrumentation techniques performed by undergraduate dental students. Study Design: Cross-sectional analytical study. Place and Duration of Study: This study was conducted at the College of Dentistry, Qassim University, Saudi Arabia, from August 21, 2024, to March 10, 2025. Methods: A total of 60 digital periapical radiographs of molars were retrospectively allocated into two groups based on the root canal instrumentation techniques. Group 1 (n=30): manual stainless-steel files using step-back technique and Group 2 (n=30): Pro Taper Gold (PTG) rotary nickel-titanium (NiTi) files using crown-down technique. All canals were obturated using cold lateral condensation with AH Plus sealer and appropriate gutta-percha points. The quality of obturation was assessed based on three parameters: length, density, and taper. A T-score (0–3) was calculated for each case. Statistical analysis was performed using Chi-square and Mann-Whitney U tests, with a p-value < 0.05 considered statistically significant. Results: Adequate obturation in terms of length, density, and taper was observed in 63.33%, 46.67%, and 36.67% of teeth in the manual group, and in 83.33%, 90%, and 93.33% of teeth in the rotary group, respectively. Statistically significant differences were found in all three parameters between the two groups (p < 0.05 for length; p < 0.001 for density and taper). The overall T-score distribution also showed a significant difference favoring the rotary technique (p < 0.001). No statistically significant associations were observed between obturation quality and either gender or tooth location within the arch (p > 0.05). Conclusion: Rotary instrumentation resulted in significantly better radiographic quality of root canal obturation compared to manual techniques. These findings support the integration of rotary systems into undergraduate endodontic training to enhance treatment outcomes.

Medical Forum MonthlyVol. 36(5)
Qassim University
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Endodontics and Root Canal Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.