Port-assisted surgery of deep space-occupying lesions: methodology and results

INTRODUCTION . Traction injury is one of the main causes of unfavorable outcomes in the removal of deep-seated brain lesions. Port-assisted surgery has been developed to minimize traction impact. Despite its growing popularity, this technique has specific technical features and limitations that are insufficiently observed in the literature. Based on our experience, we present key aspects of tubular retractor application, their advantages, and the outcomes of surgeries performed for various types of deep-seated brain lesions. AIM . To demonstrate the methodology of port-assisted surgery, its limitations, and effectiveness in the removal of deep-seated brain tumors. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Port-assisted surgeries were performed on 26 patients with deep-seated lesions: 14 with diffuse gliomas and 12 with nodular tumors. The median tumor depth was 21 [15; 27] mm, and the median volume was 18.5 [5.9; 53.5] cm3. Port placement and trajectory planning were based on preoperative MR tractography and the relationship between the lesion and the internal capsule. RESULTS . The choice of port size should account for the total length of the surgical corridor, from the skin surface to the medial edge of the tumor. This determines the area of craniotomy, dura opening, and the need for combining port-assisted surgery with conventional spatulas. EOR of surgeries using tubular retractors was 98.2 % [87.5; 100 %] for all tumors, being lower for gliomas (88.9 % [57.2; 96.0 %]) and higher for nodular tumors (100.0 % [100.0; 100.0 %]), with median volumes of 36.1 [19.8; 57.1] cm3 and 5.7 [2.8; 18.8] cm3, respectively. The median Karnofsky Performance Status score remained unchanged at 80 [70; 90]. Deterioration was observed in 4 (15.4 %) patients, but only in 1 (3.8 %) case it was persistent. No complications associated with port-assisted surgery were observed. CONCLUSION . The high radicality and favorable functional outcomes of tubular surgery for deep-seated brain tumors support its recommendation for broader clinical use.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Российский нейрохирургический журнал им профессора А Л Поленова
Published
2025-05-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.56618/2071-2693-2025-17-1-28
Primary Topic
Head and Neck Surgical Oncology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Port-assisted surgery of deep space-occupying lesions: methodology and results

Konstantin S. Yashin, M. V. Ostapyuk, Igor Medyanik, L. Ya. Kravetc et al.
Российский нейрохирургический журнал им профессора А Л Поленова
Head and Neck Surgical Oncology
article

Port-assisted surgery of deep space-occupying lesions: methodology and results

Konstantin S. Yashin, M. V. Ostapyuk, Igor Medyanik, L. Ya. Kravetc, S. V. Korikova
article en

Abstract

INTRODUCTION . Traction injury is one of the main causes of unfavorable outcomes in the removal of deep-seated brain lesions. Port-assisted surgery has been developed to minimize traction impact. Despite its growing popularity, this technique has specific technical features and limitations that are insufficiently observed in the literature. Based on our experience, we present key aspects of tubular retractor application, their advantages, and the outcomes of surgeries performed for various types of deep-seated brain lesions. AIM . To demonstrate the methodology of port-assisted surgery, its limitations, and effectiveness in the removal of deep-seated brain tumors. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Port-assisted surgeries were performed on 26 patients with deep-seated lesions: 14 with diffuse gliomas and 12 with nodular tumors. The median tumor depth was 21 [15; 27] mm, and the median volume was 18.5 [5.9; 53.5] cm3. Port placement and trajectory planning were based on preoperative MR tractography and the relationship between the lesion and the internal capsule. RESULTS . The choice of port size should account for the total length of the surgical corridor, from the skin surface to the medial edge of the tumor. This determines the area of craniotomy, dura opening, and the need for combining port-assisted surgery with conventional spatulas. EOR of surgeries using tubular retractors was 98.2 % [87.5; 100 %] for all tumors, being lower for gliomas (88.9 % [57.2; 96.0 %]) and higher for nodular tumors (100.0 % [100.0; 100.0 %]), with median volumes of 36.1 [19.8; 57.1] cm3 and 5.7 [2.8; 18.8] cm3, respectively. The median Karnofsky Performance Status score remained unchanged at 80 [70; 90]. Deterioration was observed in 4 (15.4 %) patients, but only in 1 (3.8 %) case it was persistent. No complications associated with port-assisted surgery were observed. CONCLUSION . The high radicality and favorable functional outcomes of tubular surgery for deep-seated brain tumors support its recommendation for broader clinical use.

Российский нейрохирургический журнал им профессора А Л ПоленоваVol. 17(1)
Privolzhsky Research Medical University (RU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Head and Neck Surgical Oncology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.