Potential Expansion of Low-Carbon Liquid Fuel Production Using Hydrogen-Enhanced Biomass/Municipal Solid Waste Gasification

Low-carbon liquid fuels are needed for decarbonization of hard-to-decarbonize segments of the transportation sector. This decarbonization can be limited by the amount of renewable carbon. Thermochemical conversion of biomass/municipal solid waste (MSW) through gasification is a promising route for producing low-carbon fuels. There are two major opportunities for increasing the amount of low-carbon liquid fuel that can be produced from gasification in any region. One is to increase the amount of liquid fuel from a given amount of biomass/MSW, particularly by hydrogen-enhancement of gasification synthesis gas. Second is the potential for large expansion of use of biomass feedstocks from its present level. Such biomass feedstocks include agricultural waste, forestry waste, MSW, and specially grown biomass that does not interfere with food production. The use of MSW may provide advantages of an established network for pickup and transportation of feedstock to disposal sites and the avoidance of methane produced from landfilling of MSW. As a case study, we looked at potential expansion of US low-carbon fuel production, considering the recent projections of the 2024 USDOE report, which estimated potential production of a billion tons/yr of biomass/MSW feedstocks in the US. This report included an estimated potential for liquid biofuel production of 60 billion gallons/yr of diesel energy equivalent fuel without the use of hydrogen enhancement. By hydrogen-enhanced biomass/MSW gasification, this projection could be doubled to 120 billion gallons/yr of diesel energy equivalent fuel. Furthermore, the co-location potential of biomass/MSW resources with potential renewable energy generation sites is explored. This overlap of hydrogen production and biomass production in the US are located in regions such as the US Midwest, Texas, and California. This co-location strategy enhances logistical feasibility, reducing transport costs and optimizing energy system integration; and can be applied to other geographical locations. Hydrogen-enhanced biomass/MSW gasification offers a promising route to substantially increase low-carbon liquid fuel production (e.g., methanol) and support increased liquid fuel production and greenhouse gas reduction goals.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sustainability
Published
2025-06-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/su17135718
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Thermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.70
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Potential Expansion of Low-Carbon Liquid Fuel Production Using Hydrogen-Enhanced Biomass/Municipal Solid Waste Gasification

L. Bromberg, Mohammad Ostadi, Guiyan Zang, D.R. Cohn
4 citations
Sustainability
Thermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes
2.70
article

Potential Expansion of Low-Carbon Liquid Fuel Production Using Hydrogen-Enhanced Biomass/Municipal Solid Waste Gasification

L. Bromberg, Mohammad Ostadi, Guiyan Zang, D.R. Cohn
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Low-carbon liquid fuels are needed for decarbonization of hard-to-decarbonize segments of the transportation sector. This decarbonization can be limited by the amount of renewable carbon. Thermochemical conversion of biomass/municipal solid waste (MSW) through gasification is a promising route for producing low-carbon fuels. There are two major opportunities for increasing the amount of low-carbon liquid fuel that can be produced from gasification in any region. One is to increase the amount of liquid fuel from a given amount of biomass/MSW, particularly by hydrogen-enhancement of gasification synthesis gas. Second is the potential for large expansion of use of biomass feedstocks from its present level. Such biomass feedstocks include agricultural waste, forestry waste, MSW, and specially grown biomass that does not interfere with food production. The use of MSW may provide advantages of an established network for pickup and transportation of feedstock to disposal sites and the avoidance of methane produced from landfilling of MSW. As a case study, we looked at potential expansion of US low-carbon fuel production, considering the recent projections of the 2024 USDOE report, which estimated potential production of a billion tons/yr of biomass/MSW feedstocks in the US. This report included an estimated potential for liquid biofuel production of 60 billion gallons/yr of diesel energy equivalent fuel without the use of hydrogen enhancement. By hydrogen-enhanced biomass/MSW gasification, this projection could be doubled to 120 billion gallons/yr of diesel energy equivalent fuel. Furthermore, the co-location potential of biomass/MSW resources with potential renewable energy generation sites is explored. This overlap of hydrogen production and biomass production in the US are located in regions such as the US Midwest, Texas, and California. This co-location strategy enhances logistical feasibility, reducing transport costs and optimizing energy system integration; and can be applied to other geographical locations. Hydrogen-enhanced biomass/MSW gasification offers a promising route to substantially increase low-carbon liquid fuel production (e.g., methanol) and support increased liquid fuel production and greenhouse gas reduction goals.

SustainabilityVol. 17(13)
Plasma Technology (United States) (US), Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US), Aalborg University (DK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Thermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes
2.70
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.