COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF DIFFERENCES IN THE MAIN GEOMAGNETIC INDICES ON THE DAYS OF QUIET AND DISTURBED EARTH’S MAGNETIC FIELD

Geomagnetic indices are used by researchers in helio-geophysics, heliobiology and space medicine. For planners of investigations aimed at studying the geomagnetic effects on humans it is critical to choose proper indices for accurate data acquisition. To obtain information on intercorrelations, differences and/or identity of the geomagnetic indices on the days of quiet and disturbed magnetic field, we made analysis of public records provided by Russian and international geo-monitoring centers. Also, database of the GEFEST monitoring project was used. The results showed that all geo-indices intercorrelated only on the days of the quiet or disturbed field (r is in the interval between 0.73 and 0.97). There was no overlap of correlations registered on different days. DST-index had strong correlations with other indices (r is in the interval between 0.77 and 0.93) on the days of disturbed field only. Significant differences were found after comparison of local and planetary, and regional and planetary indices registered at one and the same time. For planned investigations it is important to select a proper type of index that will characterize GM disturbance in accordance with goals of an investigation. We believe that indices measured in a geographic region are the best for assessment of the geomagnetic field effects on humans.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Aerospace and Environmental Medicine
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21687/0233-528x-2025-59-3-84-90
Primary Topic
Geomagnetism and Paleomagnetism Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF DIFFERENCES IN THE MAIN GEOMAGNETIC INDICES ON THE DAYS OF QUIET AND DISTURBED EARTH’S MAGNETIC FIELD

O. V. Gaisenok, E. Yu. Shamparov, Daria Gaisenok
Aerospace and Environmental Medicine
Geomagnetism and Paleomagnetism Studies
article

COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF DIFFERENCES IN THE MAIN GEOMAGNETIC INDICES ON THE DAYS OF QUIET AND DISTURBED EARTH’S MAGNETIC FIELD

O. V. Gaisenok, E. Yu. Shamparov, Daria Gaisenok
article en

Abstract

Geomagnetic indices are used by researchers in helio-geophysics, heliobiology and space medicine. For planners of investigations aimed at studying the geomagnetic effects on humans it is critical to choose proper indices for accurate data acquisition. To obtain information on intercorrelations, differences and/or identity of the geomagnetic indices on the days of quiet and disturbed magnetic field, we made analysis of public records provided by Russian and international geo-monitoring centers. Also, database of the GEFEST monitoring project was used. The results showed that all geo-indices intercorrelated only on the days of the quiet or disturbed field (r is in the interval between 0.73 and 0.97). There was no overlap of correlations registered on different days. DST-index had strong correlations with other indices (r is in the interval between 0.77 and 0.93) on the days of disturbed field only. Significant differences were found after comparison of local and planetary, and regional and planetary indices registered at one and the same time. For planned investigations it is important to select a proper type of index that will characterize GM disturbance in accordance with goals of an investigation. We believe that indices measured in a geographic region are the best for assessment of the geomagnetic field effects on humans.

Aerospace and Environmental MedicineVol. 59(3)
Openalex Percentile: Top 87%
Geomagnetism and Paleomagnetism Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.