Evaluation of desensitizing agents for the control of sensitivity in conventional fixed restorations

Objective: To evaluate and compare the effectiveness of the desensitizing agents Shield Force Plus, Fluor Protector S and Mi Paste Plus, in reducing post-tooth preparation sensitivity in conventional fixed restorations. Material and Methods: A randomized single-blind, controlled clinical experimental study was conducted with 32 participants requiring fixed metal-ceramic restorations. The participants were divided into four groups: SF (Shield Force Plus), FP (Fluor Protector S), MP (Mi Paste Plus), and Control. The desensitizing agents were applied three times: one day after tooth preparation, during the metal framework trial, and during the bisque trial. Sensitivity was assessed using a visual analog scale (VAS) by applying blasts of cold air in four visits at two-day intervals. To compare the perception of sensitivity between the quotes, the Friedman test was used followed by the Nemenyi Post hoc Test. Decreased sensitivity between desensitizing agents was assessed with the Kruskal- Wallis test, followed by Dunn’s post hoc test. The level was set at 5%. Results: Shield Force Plus reduced tooth sensitivity similarly to Fluor Protector S (p > 0.05) in teeth prepared for fixed prostheses. Additionally, Shield Force Plus was statistically more effective in reducing tooth sensitivity compared to Mi Paste Plus (p < 0.05). Significant differences in tooth sensitivity were noted between the evaluation sessions for all desensitizing agents (p < 0.05). Conclusion: In this study, Shield Force Plus was the most effective desensitizing agent for reducing post-tooth preparation sensitivity, followed by Fluor Protector S. KEYWORDS Desensitizing agents; Fixed restoration; Tooth sensitivity; Visual analogue scale; Vital dental preparation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Brazilian Dental Science
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4322/bds.2025.e4587
Primary Topic
Conservation Techniques and Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of desensitizing agents for the control of sensitivity in conventional fixed restorations

Marco Antonio Sánchez-Tito, Wilfredo Gustavo Escalante‐Otárola, Natalya Gomez, Juan Manuel Burgos et al.
Brazilian Dental Science
Conservation Techniques and Studies
article

Evaluation of desensitizing agents for the control of sensitivity in conventional fixed restorations

Marco Antonio Sánchez-Tito, Wilfredo Gustavo Escalante‐Otárola, Natalya Gomez, Juan Manuel Burgos, Aracy Diana ZARATE MAQUERA
article en

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate and compare the effectiveness of the desensitizing agents Shield Force Plus, Fluor Protector S and Mi Paste Plus, in reducing post-tooth preparation sensitivity in conventional fixed restorations. Material and Methods: A randomized single-blind, controlled clinical experimental study was conducted with 32 participants requiring fixed metal-ceramic restorations. The participants were divided into four groups: SF (Shield Force Plus), FP (Fluor Protector S), MP (Mi Paste Plus), and Control. The desensitizing agents were applied three times: one day after tooth preparation, during the metal framework trial, and during the bisque trial. Sensitivity was assessed using a visual analog scale (VAS) by applying blasts of cold air in four visits at two-day intervals. To compare the perception of sensitivity between the quotes, the Friedman test was used followed by the Nemenyi Post hoc Test. Decreased sensitivity between desensitizing agents was assessed with the Kruskal- Wallis test, followed by Dunn’s post hoc test. The level was set at 5%. Results: Shield Force Plus reduced tooth sensitivity similarly to Fluor Protector S (p > 0.05) in teeth prepared for fixed prostheses. Additionally, Shield Force Plus was statistically more effective in reducing tooth sensitivity compared to Mi Paste Plus (p < 0.05). Significant differences in tooth sensitivity were noted between the evaluation sessions for all desensitizing agents (p < 0.05). Conclusion: In this study, Shield Force Plus was the most effective desensitizing agent for reducing post-tooth preparation sensitivity, followed by Fluor Protector S. KEYWORDS Desensitizing agents; Fixed restoration; Tooth sensitivity; Visual analogue scale; Vital dental preparation.

Brazilian Dental ScienceVol. 28(1)
Universidad Privada de Tacna (PE), Catholic University of Santa María (PE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 82%
Conservation Techniques and Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.