Catalogs of Solar Wind Types and Their Role in Solar–Terrestrial Physics

The magnetosphere response to interplanetary drivers depends on their type. The reliability of their identification affects сonclusions made on the basis of an analysis of the relationships between the solar wind and the magnetosphere. In this paper, we analyze the list of moderate and strong geomagnetic storms and their interplanetary sources for the period of 2009–2019 presented by Qiu et al. It is shown that some of the events in this list were defined incorrectly, and their interpretation differs in ∼20% of cases from our catalog by Yermolaev et al. ( http://www.iki.rssi.ru/omni/ ) for the solar wind types Sheath, ICME, and CIR, and in ∼28% of cases from the catalog of Richardson and Cane for ICME. Using the uncorrected list of Qiu et al. can lead to incorrect identification of interplanetary drivers of magnetic storms and false conclusions. It is recommended to use the classification of interplanetary drivers from catalogs of events accepted by the scientific community as reference ones.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cosmic Research
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1134/s0010952524600215
Primary Topic
Solar and Space Plasma Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Catalogs of Solar Wind Types and Their Role in Solar–Terrestrial Physics

И. Г. Лодкина, Yu. I. Yermolaev, Alexander A. Khokhlachev
Cosmic Research
Solar and Space Plasma Dynamics
article

Catalogs of Solar Wind Types and Their Role in Solar–Terrestrial Physics

И. Г. Лодкина, Yu. I. Yermolaev, Alexander A. Khokhlachev
article en

Abstract

The magnetosphere response to interplanetary drivers depends on their type. The reliability of their identification affects сonclusions made on the basis of an analysis of the relationships between the solar wind and the magnetosphere. In this paper, we analyze the list of moderate and strong geomagnetic storms and their interplanetary sources for the period of 2009–2019 presented by Qiu et al. It is shown that some of the events in this list were defined incorrectly, and their interpretation differs in ∼20% of cases from our catalog by Yermolaev et al. ( http://www.iki.rssi.ru/omni/ ) for the solar wind types Sheath, ICME, and CIR, and in ∼28% of cases from the catalog of Richardson and Cane for ICME. Using the uncorrected list of Qiu et al. can lead to incorrect identification of interplanetary drivers of magnetic storms and false conclusions. It is recommended to use the classification of interplanetary drivers from catalogs of events accepted by the scientific community as reference ones.

Cosmic ResearchVol. 63(2)
Space Research Institute (RU)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 91%
Solar and Space Plasma Dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.