Named Entity Recognition Reinforced by Prompt Learning

In recent years, Named Entity Recognition (NER), as a fundamental task in information extraction, has found wide applications across various domains, yet continues to face significant methodological challenges. Traditional Named Entity Recognition (NER) methods often lack universal applicability and require model retraining for each new domain, despite being a fundamental task in information extraction with wide applications across various domains. The emergence of Large Language Models (LLMs) has brought new possibilities to NER tasks, offering unprecedented flexibility and promising results through their powerful language understanding capabilities. However, even these advanced models face notable challenges: they often struggle with precise entity boundary recognition and suffer from the “hallucination” problem, generating false or inconsistent entity information. Despite LLMs' strong general language understanding abilities, the complexity of cross-domain knowledge transfer and the requirement for substantial labeled training data continue to pose significant challenges, especially in specialized domains. While recent research has explored various ways to leverage LLMs' capabilities through hybrid approaches that combine their strengths with traditional methods, achieving robust and reliable entity recognition across diverse domains remains a substantial challenge in the field.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-04-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/ainit65432.2025.11035255
Primary Topic
Topic Modeling
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Named Entity Recognition Reinforced by Prompt Learning

Yikeremu Maimaitiyiming, Maihemuti Maimaiti, Tao Wang, Le Zhang
Topic Modeling
article

Named Entity Recognition Reinforced by Prompt Learning

Yikeremu Maimaitiyiming, Maihemuti Maimaiti, Tao Wang, Le Zhang
article en

Abstract

In recent years, Named Entity Recognition (NER), as a fundamental task in information extraction, has found wide applications across various domains, yet continues to face significant methodological challenges. Traditional Named Entity Recognition (NER) methods often lack universal applicability and require model retraining for each new domain, despite being a fundamental task in information extraction with wide applications across various domains. The emergence of Large Language Models (LLMs) has brought new possibilities to NER tasks, offering unprecedented flexibility and promising results through their powerful language understanding capabilities. However, even these advanced models face notable challenges: they often struggle with precise entity boundary recognition and suffer from the “hallucination” problem, generating false or inconsistent entity information. Despite LLMs' strong general language understanding abilities, the complexity of cross-domain knowledge transfer and the requirement for substantial labeled training data continue to pose significant challenges, especially in specialized domains. While recent research has explored various ways to leverage LLMs' capabilities through hybrid approaches that combine their strengths with traditional methods, achieving robust and reliable entity recognition across diverse domains remains a substantial challenge in the field.

Xinjiang University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 93%
Topic Modeling
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Named Entity Recognition Reinforced by Prompt Learning — Yikeremu Maimaitiyiming, Maihemuti Maimaiti, et al. · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS