Fair Causal Decision Tree

The decision tree algorithm is an effective machine learning technique, but it cannot uncover causal relationships within data. To overcome this limitation, the causal decision tree was proposed, which combines causal discovery with decision tree principles. This method is particularly effective at identifying causal relationships in complex datasets. Currently, causal decision tree algorithms are being applied in various fields, including biology and politics. However, existing causal decision tree algorithms do not account the fairness. To fill this gap, this paper proposes the Fair Causal Decision Tree (FCDT), constructed through a fair post-pruning process. The FCDT ensures the algorithm's fairness while maintaining the causality inherent in the causal decision tree. To preserve the algorithm's causality, this paper introduces the Causal Structure Change Constraint (CSCC), which guarantees that the causal decision tree retains its strong causal properties when handling unfair nodes. This innovative constraint ensures that any structural modifications during the fairness adjust-ment process almost not decrease the algorithm's causality. The experiments were conducted on multiple datasets, and the results demonstrate that the proposed algorithm enhances fairness by approximately 10% compared to traditional causal decision tree algorithms, with only about a 1 % decrease in recall rate.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-05-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/cscwd64889.2025.11033273
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Fair Causal Decision Tree

Yi Tao Yang, Chunming Yang, Bo Li, Hui Zhang et al.
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

Fair Causal Decision Tree

Yi Tao Yang, Chunming Yang, Bo Li, Hui Zhang, Wenkai Chen, Xujian Zhao
article en

Abstract

The decision tree algorithm is an effective machine learning technique, but it cannot uncover causal relationships within data. To overcome this limitation, the causal decision tree was proposed, which combines causal discovery with decision tree principles. This method is particularly effective at identifying causal relationships in complex datasets. Currently, causal decision tree algorithms are being applied in various fields, including biology and politics. However, existing causal decision tree algorithms do not account the fairness. To fill this gap, this paper proposes the Fair Causal Decision Tree (FCDT), constructed through a fair post-pruning process. The FCDT ensures the algorithm's fairness while maintaining the causality inherent in the causal decision tree. To preserve the algorithm's causality, this paper introduces the Causal Structure Change Constraint (CSCC), which guarantees that the causal decision tree retains its strong causal properties when handling unfair nodes. This innovative constraint ensures that any structural modifications during the fairness adjust-ment process almost not decrease the algorithm's causality. The experiments were conducted on multiple datasets, and the results demonstrate that the proposed algorithm enhances fairness by approximately 10% compared to traditional causal decision tree algorithms, with only about a 1 % decrease in recall rate.

Southwest University of Science and Technology (CN), China National Institute of Standardization (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 86%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Fair Causal Decision Tree — Yi Tao Yang, Chunming Yang, et al. · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS