The Procedural Planning Abilities of Cloud-Based LLMS in Embodied Environments: A Meta-Analysis

Recent advancements in large language models (LLMs) have transformed natural language processing and extended their application to the challenging domain of procedural planning in embodied environments. In these settings, high-level goals must be decomposed into precise, sequential actions that can be executed by robots or simulated agents, a task complicated by dynamic real-world constraints and inherent ambiguity. We present a systematic meta-analysis of procedural planning methodologies, categorizing existing studies into four approaches. By leveraging the VirtualHome ActivityPrograms dataset, our analysis shows that while foundational methods remain competitive, novel techniques that incorporate feedback, symbolic reasoning, and external tools significantly enhance the executability and robustness of plans. We identify challenges in reasoning granularity, plan-world misalignment, and scalability, and propose directions toward unified, self-reflective planning frameworks.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-04-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/ainit65432.2025.11035707
Primary Topic
Cloud Computing and Resource Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Procedural Planning Abilities of Cloud-Based LLMS in Embodied Environments: A Meta-Analysis

Jun You, Lei Zhao, Zhenhao Xu, Yan Gao
Cloud Computing and Resource Management
article

The Procedural Planning Abilities of Cloud-Based LLMS in Embodied Environments: A Meta-Analysis

Jun You, Lei Zhao, Zhenhao Xu, Yan Gao
article en

Abstract

Recent advancements in large language models (LLMs) have transformed natural language processing and extended their application to the challenging domain of procedural planning in embodied environments. In these settings, high-level goals must be decomposed into precise, sequential actions that can be executed by robots or simulated agents, a task complicated by dynamic real-world constraints and inherent ambiguity. We present a systematic meta-analysis of procedural planning methodologies, categorizing existing studies into four approaches. By leveraging the VirtualHome ActivityPrograms dataset, our analysis shows that while foundational methods remain competitive, novel techniques that incorporate feedback, symbolic reasoning, and external tools significantly enhance the executability and robustness of plans. We identify challenges in reasoning granularity, plan-world misalignment, and scalability, and propose directions toward unified, self-reflective planning frameworks.

Ministry of Industry and Information Technology (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Cloud Computing and Resource Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The Procedural Planning Abilities of Cloud-Based LLMS in Embodied Environments: A Meta-Analysis — Jun You, Lei Zhao, et al. · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS