Enhancing the Pedestrian Crossing Modeling with Priority Regulations in Vissim Traffic Simulation Software

This study investigates the performance of the traffic simulation software Vissim in the context of pedestrian crossings. The primary aim was to analyze the functioning principles and limitations of priority regulation methods, compare their performance, and propose potential improvement options. Vissim provides two core methods for managing priority—conflict zones and priority rules. However, these approaches do not fully address real-word factors, such as noncompliance with priority rules and pedestrian's crossing decisions based on vehicle proximity. To overcome these limitations, we introduced an innovative methodology utilizing loop detectors placed at 10-meter intervals to monitor vehicle positions. This was combined with signal logic to simulate pedestrians' distance-dependent crossing decisions. The integration of real-world pedestrian decisionmaking processes into the simulation was validated through modifications to the software, and their impacts on key performance indicators - such as execution time and accuracy - were evaluated. The proposed approach provides a more realistic representation of pedestrian-vehicle interactions, significantly improving the accuracy and reliability of traffic simulations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-05-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/scsp65598.2025.11037710
Primary Topic
Traffic Prediction and Management Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Enhancing the Pedestrian Crossing Modeling with Priority Regulations in Vissim Traffic Simulation Software

Dávid Földes, Gábor Pauer, Szilárd Szigeti
Traffic Prediction and Management Techniques
article

Enhancing the Pedestrian Crossing Modeling with Priority Regulations in Vissim Traffic Simulation Software

Dávid Földes, Gábor Pauer, Szilárd Szigeti
article en

Abstract

This study investigates the performance of the traffic simulation software Vissim in the context of pedestrian crossings. The primary aim was to analyze the functioning principles and limitations of priority regulation methods, compare their performance, and propose potential improvement options. Vissim provides two core methods for managing priority—conflict zones and priority rules. However, these approaches do not fully address real-word factors, such as noncompliance with priority rules and pedestrian's crossing decisions based on vehicle proximity. To overcome these limitations, we introduced an innovative methodology utilizing loop detectors placed at 10-meter intervals to monitor vehicle positions. This was combined with signal logic to simulate pedestrians' distance-dependent crossing decisions. The integration of real-world pedestrian decisionmaking processes into the simulation was validated through modifications to the software, and their impacts on key performance indicators - such as execution time and accuracy - were evaluated. The proposed approach provides a more realistic representation of pedestrian-vehicle interactions, significantly improving the accuracy and reliability of traffic simulations.

Budapest University of Technology and Economics (HU), Institute for Transport Sciences (HU)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 85%
Traffic Prediction and Management Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Enhancing the Pedestrian Crossing Modeling with Priority Regulations in Vissim Traffic Simulation Software — Dávid Földes, Gábor Pauer, et al. · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS