Optimizing NLP Model Deployment: A Comparative Analysis of Fine-Tuning, Few-Shot Learning, and Prompt Engineering Strategies

As large language models continue to revolutionize natural language processing, the trade-offs between performance, computational efficiency, and resource requirements become increasingly critical. This paper presents a comprehensive evaluation of three prominent approaches: fine-tuning, few-shot learning, and zero-shot learning using sentiment analysis as a case study. We benchmark the efficacy of these methods across multiple dimensions, including accuracy, inference time, computational cost, and adaptability to new domains. Our experiments, conducted on a state-of-the-art NVIDIA H100 GPU and extrapolated to AWS cloud infrastructure, reveal nuanced insights into the practical implications of deploying these approaches. Fine-tuning achieved the highest accuracy (<tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">$\mathbf{7 0. 0 6 \%}$</tex>) but at substantial computational cost (<tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">$344.10$</tex> for 5 iterations). Few-shot learning emerged as a compelling alternative, reaching 65.05 % accuracy with minimal resource usage (<tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">$17.95$</tex> for 5 iterations) and demonstrating strong adaptability. Surprisingly, zero-shot learning with prompts showed decreased performance compared to no-prompt baselines, challenging common assumptions about prompt engineering while using a fine tuned model. These findings have far-reaching implications for the deployment of language models across various applications. We provide a decision-making framework that balances performance gains against resource constraints, offering valuable guidance for practitioners and researchers alike. Our research not only contributes to the ongoing dialogue about the most effective ways to leverage large language models but also highlights the need for continued innovation in resource-efficient NLP techniques. As the field evolves, the insights from this study will help inform strategies for developing more adaptable, efficient, and powerful language processing systems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-04-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/ainit65432.2025.11035028
Primary Topic
Software Testing and Debugging Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Optimizing NLP Model Deployment: A Comparative Analysis of Fine-Tuning, Few-Shot Learning, and Prompt Engineering Strategies

Anuj Kumar Jain, Aldo Francis Augustine, Bhavani Sankar Telaprolu
2 links
Software Testing and Debugging Techniques
article

Optimizing NLP Model Deployment: A Comparative Analysis of Fine-Tuning, Few-Shot Learning, and Prompt Engineering Strategies

Anuj Kumar Jain, Aldo Francis Augustine, Bhavani Sankar Telaprolu
article en

Abstract

As large language models continue to revolutionize natural language processing, the trade-offs between performance, computational efficiency, and resource requirements become increasingly critical. This paper presents a comprehensive evaluation of three prominent approaches: fine-tuning, few-shot learning, and zero-shot learning using sentiment analysis as a case study. We benchmark the efficacy of these methods across multiple dimensions, including accuracy, inference time, computational cost, and adaptability to new domains. Our experiments, conducted on a state-of-the-art NVIDIA H100 GPU and extrapolated to AWS cloud infrastructure, reveal nuanced insights into the practical implications of deploying these approaches. Fine-tuning achieved the highest accuracy (<tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">$\mathbf{7 0. 0 6 \%}$</tex>) but at substantial computational cost (<tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">$344.10$</tex> for 5 iterations). Few-shot learning emerged as a compelling alternative, reaching 65.05 % accuracy with minimal resource usage (<tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">$17.95$</tex> for 5 iterations) and demonstrating strong adaptability. Surprisingly, zero-shot learning with prompts showed decreased performance compared to no-prompt baselines, challenging common assumptions about prompt engineering while using a fine tuned model. These findings have far-reaching implications for the deployment of language models across various applications. We provide a decision-making framework that balances performance gains against resource constraints, offering valuable guidance for practitioners and researchers alike. Our research not only contributes to the ongoing dialogue about the most effective ways to leverage large language models but also highlights the need for continued innovation in resource-efficient NLP techniques. As the field evolves, the insights from this study will help inform strategies for developing more adaptable, efficient, and powerful language processing systems.

Northeastern University (US), Pega (United States) (US), Seattle University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 85%
Software Testing and Debugging Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.