Detecting Deceptive Reviews Using Text Features Only

The growth of online reviews in the healthcare sector makes it a great challenge to distinguish between honest and deceptive reviews. This underlines the urgent need for tools to detect misleading reviews in order to ensure credibility. In this study, we address the detection of deceptive reviews in the healthcare sector by utilizing a dataset from Amazon's health and personal care reviews. We applied a machine learning pipeline that includes data cleaning, feature extraction, and classification. We focused only on text features such as N-grams, VADER sentiment analysis, and part-of-speech tagging. Our contribution is to compare the accuracy of different classification models, including logistic regression, naive bayes, and LSTM, combined with different text features, and identify an effective method for detecting deceptive reviews. Our results show that Bigram and Trigram models with Naive Bayes classifiers outperform other methods, achieving the highest accuracy in identifying deceptive reviews.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/afros62115.2024.11036897
Primary Topic
Misinformation and Its Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Detecting Deceptive Reviews Using Text Features Only

Mohammed Ismail Smahi, Abdelmajid Meghebbar, Abdelkrim Benamar
Misinformation and Its Impacts
article

Detecting Deceptive Reviews Using Text Features Only

Mohammed Ismail Smahi, Abdelmajid Meghebbar, Abdelkrim Benamar
article en

Abstract

The growth of online reviews in the healthcare sector makes it a great challenge to distinguish between honest and deceptive reviews. This underlines the urgent need for tools to detect misleading reviews in order to ensure credibility. In this study, we address the detection of deceptive reviews in the healthcare sector by utilizing a dataset from Amazon's health and personal care reviews. We applied a machine learning pipeline that includes data cleaning, feature extraction, and classification. We focused only on text features such as N-grams, VADER sentiment analysis, and part-of-speech tagging. Our contribution is to compare the accuracy of different classification models, including logistic regression, naive bayes, and LSTM, combined with different text features, and identify an effective method for detecting deceptive reviews. Our results show that Bigram and Trigram models with Naive Bayes classifiers outperform other methods, achieving the highest accuracy in identifying deceptive reviews.

University of Abou Bekr Belkaïd (DZ)
Openalex Percentile: Top 52%
Misinformation and Its Impacts
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.