DPFuzzer: Discovering Safety Critical Vulnerabilities for Drone Path Planners

State-of-the-art drone path planners enable drones to autonomously travel through obstacles in GPS-denied, uncharted, cluttered environments. However, our investigation shows that path planners fail to maneuver drones correctly in specific scenarios, leading to incidents such as collisions. To minimize such risks, drone path planners should be tested thoroughly against diverse scenarios before deployment. Existing research for testing drones to uncover safety-critical vulnerabilities is only focused on flight control programs and is limited in the capability to generate diverse obstacle scenarios for testing drone path planners. In this work, we propose DPFuzzer, an automated framework for testing drone path planners. DPFuzzer is an evolutionary algorithm (EA) based testing framework. It aims to uncover vulnerabilities in drone path planners by generating diverse critical scenarios that can trigger vulnerabilities. To better guide the critical scenario generation, we introduce Environmental Risk Factor (ERF), a metric we propose, to abstract potential safety threats of scenarios. We evaluate DPFuzzer on state-of-the-art drone path planners and the experimental result shows that DPFuzzer can effectively find diverse vulnerabilities. Additionally, we demonstrate that these vulnerabilities are exploitable in the real world.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-04-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/icse55347.2025.00051
Primary Topic
Robotic Path Planning Algorithms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

DPFuzzer: Discovering Safety Critical Vulnerabilities for Drone Path Planners

Yue Wang, Xiaodong Zhang, Jianfeng Ma, Chao Yang et al.
Robotic Path Planning Algorithms
article

DPFuzzer: Discovering Safety Critical Vulnerabilities for Drone Path Planners

Yue Wang, Xiaodong Zhang, Jianfeng Ma, Chao Yang, Ying Deng
article en

Abstract

State-of-the-art drone path planners enable drones to autonomously travel through obstacles in GPS-denied, uncharted, cluttered environments. However, our investigation shows that path planners fail to maneuver drones correctly in specific scenarios, leading to incidents such as collisions. To minimize such risks, drone path planners should be tested thoroughly against diverse scenarios before deployment. Existing research for testing drones to uncover safety-critical vulnerabilities is only focused on flight control programs and is limited in the capability to generate diverse obstacle scenarios for testing drone path planners. In this work, we propose DPFuzzer, an automated framework for testing drone path planners. DPFuzzer is an evolutionary algorithm (EA) based testing framework. It aims to uncover vulnerabilities in drone path planners by generating diverse critical scenarios that can trigger vulnerabilities. To better guide the critical scenario generation, we introduce Environmental Risk Factor (ERF), a metric we propose, to abstract potential safety threats of scenarios. We evaluate DPFuzzer on state-of-the-art drone path planners and the experimental result shows that DPFuzzer can effectively find diverse vulnerabilities. Additionally, we demonstrate that these vulnerabilities are exploitable in the real world.

Xidian University (CN)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 87%
Robotic Path Planning Algorithms
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

DPFuzzer: Discovering Safety Critical Vulnerabilities for Drone Path Planners — Yue Wang, Xiaodong Zhang, et al. · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS