Small but Fair! Fairness for Multimodal Human-Human and Robot-Human Mental Wellbeing Coaching

In recent years, the affective computing (AC) and human-robot interaction (HRI) research communities have put fairness at the centre of their research agenda. However, none of the existing work has addressed the problem of machine learning (ML) bias in HRI settings. In addition, many of the current datasets for AC and HRI are ‘small’, making ML bias and debias analysis challenging. This paper presents the first work to explore ML bias analysis and mitigation of three small multimodal datasets collected within both a human-human and robot-human wellbeing coaching settings. The contributions of this work includes: i) being the first to explore the problem of ML bias within HRI settings; and ii) providing a multimodal analysis evaluated via modelling performance and fairness metrics across both high and low-level features and proposing a simple and effective data augmentation strategy (MixFeat) to debias the small datasets presented within this paper; and iii) conducting extensive experimentation and analyses to reveal ML fairness insights unique to AC and HRI research in order to distill a set of recommendations to aid AC and HRI researchers to be more engaged with fairness-aware ML-based research.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/taffc.2025.3582074
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Cognitive Functions and Memory
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
12.71
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Small but Fair! Fairness for Multimodal Human-Human and Robot-Human Mental Wellbeing Coaching

Jiaee Cheong, Micol Spitale, Hatice Güneş
6 citations
IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing
Cognitive Functions and Memory
12.71
article

Small but Fair! Fairness for Multimodal Human-Human and Robot-Human Mental Wellbeing Coaching

Jiaee Cheong, Micol Spitale, Hatice Güneş
article en
6 citations

Abstract

In recent years, the affective computing (AC) and human-robot interaction (HRI) research communities have put fairness at the centre of their research agenda. However, none of the existing work has addressed the problem of machine learning (ML) bias in HRI settings. In addition, many of the current datasets for AC and HRI are ‘small’, making ML bias and debias analysis challenging. This paper presents the first work to explore ML bias analysis and mitigation of three small multimodal datasets collected within both a human-human and robot-human wellbeing coaching settings. The contributions of this work includes: i) being the first to explore the problem of ML bias within HRI settings; and ii) providing a multimodal analysis evaluated via modelling performance and fairness metrics across both high and low-level features and proposing a simple and effective data augmentation strategy (MixFeat) to debias the small datasets presented within this paper; and iii) conducting extensive experimentation and analyses to reveal ML fairness insights unique to AC and HRI research in order to distill a set of recommendations to aid AC and HRI researchers to be more engaged with fairness-aware ML-based research.

IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Cognitive Functions and Memory
12.71
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.