A Comparative Study of XBORE and XBOREOPT Hybrid Models for Ore Production Forecasting in the Mining Industry

Mining industries worldwide are increasingly adopting machine learning tools to handle the vast amounts of data generated daily from mine systems. Few hybrid models have been developed to handle data from mine systems, and this study investigates the comparative performance of machine learning algorithms XBORE and XBOREOPT for predicting ore production in mining operations. The study explores the efficacy of hyperparameter optimization techniques in enhancing predictive accuracy, robustness, and computational efficiency, which are crucial for optimizing resource allocation and operational planning in mining contexts. Through empirical evaluation using real-world data, this research aims to provide insights into the practical benefits of hybrid modeling approaches in industrial predictive analytics. In terms of Mean Squared Error (MSE), XBORE scores 347.8001, whereas XBOREOPT achieves a lower value of 340.5477. Since MSE penalizes larger errors more heavily, the lower MSE of XBOREOPT suggests it is more effective at minimizing significant prediction errors. This study combines the viability of hybrid modeling with practical applications in the mining industry, focusing on enhancing predictive accuracy and operational efficiency.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
IEEE Access
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2025.3582332
Primary Topic
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Comparative Study of XBORE and XBOREOPT Hybrid Models for Ore Production Forecasting in the Mining Industry

Santhi Kumaran, Morris Mkokweza, George Mufungulwa
IEEE Access
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
article

A Comparative Study of XBORE and XBOREOPT Hybrid Models for Ore Production Forecasting in the Mining Industry

Santhi Kumaran, Morris Mkokweza, George Mufungulwa
article en

Abstract

Mining industries worldwide are increasingly adopting machine learning tools to handle the vast amounts of data generated daily from mine systems. Few hybrid models have been developed to handle data from mine systems, and this study investigates the comparative performance of machine learning algorithms XBORE and XBOREOPT for predicting ore production in mining operations. The study explores the efficacy of hyperparameter optimization techniques in enhancing predictive accuracy, robustness, and computational efficiency, which are crucial for optimizing resource allocation and operational planning in mining contexts. Through empirical evaluation using real-world data, this research aims to provide insights into the practical benefits of hybrid modeling approaches in industrial predictive analytics. In terms of Mean Squared Error (MSE), XBORE scores 347.8001, whereas XBOREOPT achieves a lower value of 340.5477. Since MSE penalizes larger errors more heavily, the lower MSE of XBOREOPT suggests it is more effective at minimizing significant prediction errors. This study combines the viability of hybrid modeling with practical applications in the mining industry, focusing on enhancing predictive accuracy and operational efficiency.

IEEE AccessVol. 13
Copperbelt University (ZM)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 93%
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A Comparative Study of XBORE and XBOREOPT Hybrid Models for Ore Production Forecasting in the Mining Industry — Santhi Kumaran, Morris Mkokweza, et al. · IEEE Access (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS