Doors of modernity

At the turn of the 20th century, a range of new objects, appliances, machines, and infrastructures began to be incorporated into buildings: ticket offices, elevators, heating systems, and revolving doors. Much like technical objects designed by engineers, scientists, doctors, or inventors, these elements are not generally considered part of architecture—even though, alongside with more conventional components such as walls, ceilings, staircases, and windows, they shaped the framework of modern life. They were as much its expression as its condition. Taking the revolving door as an example, this essay explores how the management of modern crowds in the emerging mass society transformed the very core of public architecture. It further shows that the acceptance of this seemingly generic object was far from self-evident, but rather contingent on a specific architectural and societal milieu. Finally, it argues that the function of the revolving door could, depending on that milieu, be radically inverted—turned into its very opposite.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Perspectives in architecture and urbanism.
Published
2025-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pau.2025.100039
Primary Topic
Political Economy and Marxism
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Doors of modernity

Laurent Stalder
Perspectives in architecture and urbanism.
Political Economy and Marxism
article

Doors of modernity

Laurent Stalder
article en

Abstract

At the turn of the 20th century, a range of new objects, appliances, machines, and infrastructures began to be incorporated into buildings: ticket offices, elevators, heating systems, and revolving doors. Much like technical objects designed by engineers, scientists, doctors, or inventors, these elements are not generally considered part of architecture—even though, alongside with more conventional components such as walls, ceilings, staircases, and windows, they shaped the framework of modern life. They were as much its expression as its condition. Taking the revolving door as an example, this essay explores how the management of modern crowds in the emerging mass society transformed the very core of public architecture. It further shows that the acceptance of this seemingly generic object was far from self-evident, but rather contingent on a specific architectural and societal milieu. Finally, it argues that the function of the revolving door could, depending on that milieu, be radically inverted—turned into its very opposite.

Perspectives in architecture and urbanism.Vol. 2(1)
ETH Zurich (CH)
Openalex Percentile: Top 81%
Political Economy and Marxism
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.