AI in Healthcare for Resource Limited Settings: An Exploration and Ethical Evaluation

Advances in artificial intelligence (AI) hold great promise to transform healthcare in resource-limited settings (RLS). However, due to challenges such as shortages in healthcare professionals, data scarcity, and inadequate regulatory frameworks, RLS are left especially vulnerable to AI's potential risks and ethical violations. Thus, despite rising expectations, substantial gaps remain in our understanding of how to responsibly integrate AI into the healthcare systems of RLS. In response, this review critically examines AI healthcare applications in RLS, with the intention of promoting ethical, transparent, and secure principles for future implementations. We first provide an exploration of the potential uses of AI in resource-limited healthcare and present four broad subfields: decision support, predictive analytics, telemedicine and digital health tools, and resource management. Taking an analytical approach, we illustrate both the potential benefits and hidden ethical pitfalls that may arise when implementing AI in contexts with limited human and financial resources. Drawing on both recent studies and original perspectives, we aim to provide an overview of major ethical concerns in an RLS context - including algorithmic bias, non-maleficence, privacy and security, autonomy, and transparency - as well as discussing additional ethical dilemmas rarely addressed in literature. Subsequently, we advocate for context-specific regulations and culturally sensitive frameworks, in addition to robust oversight and active local participation. Finally, we provide recommendations that aim to protect patient welfare, uphold autonomy, and promote equity-so that AI applications ultimately strengthen, rather than undermine, global efforts to reduce healthcare disparities.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-05-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1145/3701716.3717747
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.62
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

AI in Healthcare for Resource Limited Settings: An Exploration and Ethical Evaluation

Xiangshang Yuan, Ruimin Zhao
4 citations
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
2.62
article

AI in Healthcare for Resource Limited Settings: An Exploration and Ethical Evaluation

Xiangshang Yuan, Ruimin Zhao
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Advances in artificial intelligence (AI) hold great promise to transform healthcare in resource-limited settings (RLS). However, due to challenges such as shortages in healthcare professionals, data scarcity, and inadequate regulatory frameworks, RLS are left especially vulnerable to AI's potential risks and ethical violations. Thus, despite rising expectations, substantial gaps remain in our understanding of how to responsibly integrate AI into the healthcare systems of RLS. In response, this review critically examines AI healthcare applications in RLS, with the intention of promoting ethical, transparent, and secure principles for future implementations. We first provide an exploration of the potential uses of AI in resource-limited healthcare and present four broad subfields: decision support, predictive analytics, telemedicine and digital health tools, and resource management. Taking an analytical approach, we illustrate both the potential benefits and hidden ethical pitfalls that may arise when implementing AI in contexts with limited human and financial resources. Drawing on both recent studies and original perspectives, we aim to provide an overview of major ethical concerns in an RLS context - including algorithmic bias, non-maleficence, privacy and security, autonomy, and transparency - as well as discussing additional ethical dilemmas rarely addressed in literature. Subsequently, we advocate for context-specific regulations and culturally sensitive frameworks, in addition to robust oversight and active local participation. Finally, we provide recommendations that aim to protect patient welfare, uphold autonomy, and promote equity-so that AI applications ultimately strengthen, rather than undermine, global efforts to reduce healthcare disparities.

Australian National University (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
2.62
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

AI in Healthcare for Resource Limited Settings: An Exploration and Ethical Evaluation — Xiangshang Yuan, Ruimin Zhao · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS