Acute Vascular Responses to Moderate Intensity Continuous Training Across the Natural Menstrual Cycle and Oral-Contraceptive Cycle in Healthy Young Premenopausal Women

We have previously reported the acute vascular responses to a single bout of high intensity interval training (HIIT) across the natural menstrual cycle (MC) and oral-contraceptive cycle (OC) in healthy young premenopausal women. Here, we investigated in twenty-one healthy young premenopausal women whether the acute vascular responses to a single bout of moderate intensity continuous training (MICT) differ: 1) among the early-follicular, late-follicular, and mid-luteal phases of the MC (n=11); 2) between the active (estradiol and progestin) and placebo phases of the OC (n=10); and 3) compared to the acute vascular responses to HIIT across the MC (n=11) and OC (n=10). The order of MICT and HIIT was randomized. Acute vascular responses to a single bout of MICT and HIIT were assessed before exercise, at the end of exercise, and during recovery. Carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (cfPWV) and augmentation index at heart rate 75 bpm (AIx@75)—indices of arterial stiffness and wave reflection, respectively—and central blood pressure were assessed using SphygmoCor XCEL. We found that the acute vascular (i.e., central systolic and diastolic blood pressure, cfPWV, and AIx@75) responses to MICT were not significantly different among the early-follicular, late-follicular, and mid-luteal phases of the MC ( P ≥0.1; phase x time) and between the active and placebo OC phases ( P ≥0.4; phase x time). When comparing the acute vascular responses to MICT vs. HIIT, we found that central systolic and diastolic blood pressure, cfPWV, and AIx@75 did not change differently in response to MICT vs. HIIT across the MC ( P ≥0.2; exercise type x phase x time) and OC ( P ≥0.5; exercise type x phase x time). In conclusion, we have demonstrated in healthy young premenopausal women that the acute arterial stiffness, wave reflection, and central blood pressure responses to MICT: 1) are not influenced by hormonal fluctuations among the early-follicular, late-follicular, and mid-luteal MC phases; 2) are not influenced by hormonal differences between the active and placebo OC phases; and 3) are not different compared to the acute vascular responses to HIIT across the MC and OC. This abstract was presented at the American Physiology Summit 2025 and is only available in HTML format. There is no downloadable file or PDF version. The Physiology editorial board was not involved in the peer review process.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Physiology
Published
2025-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1152/physiol.2025.40.s1.1705
Primary Topic
Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Acute Vascular Responses to Moderate Intensity Continuous Training Across the Natural Menstrual Cycle and Oral-Contraceptive Cycle in Healthy Young Premenopausal Women

Zachary Rubin, Jisok Lim, Águeda Lozano Medina, Jin‐Su Kim et al.
Physiology
Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes
article

Acute Vascular Responses to Moderate Intensity Continuous Training Across the Natural Menstrual Cycle and Oral-Contraceptive Cycle in Healthy Young Premenopausal Women

Zachary Rubin, Jisok Lim, Águeda Lozano Medina, Jin‐Su Kim, Yasemin Sakarya, Demetra D. Christou, Chatchamarn Soonhuae, Stephanie Lapierre-Nguyen, Kenzie Luckett
article en

Abstract

We have previously reported the acute vascular responses to a single bout of high intensity interval training (HIIT) across the natural menstrual cycle (MC) and oral-contraceptive cycle (OC) in healthy young premenopausal women. Here, we investigated in twenty-one healthy young premenopausal women whether the acute vascular responses to a single bout of moderate intensity continuous training (MICT) differ: 1) among the early-follicular, late-follicular, and mid-luteal phases of the MC (n=11); 2) between the active (estradiol and progestin) and placebo phases of the OC (n=10); and 3) compared to the acute vascular responses to HIIT across the MC (n=11) and OC (n=10). The order of MICT and HIIT was randomized. Acute vascular responses to a single bout of MICT and HIIT were assessed before exercise, at the end of exercise, and during recovery. Carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (cfPWV) and augmentation index at heart rate 75 bpm (AIx@75)—indices of arterial stiffness and wave reflection, respectively—and central blood pressure were assessed using SphygmoCor XCEL. We found that the acute vascular (i.e., central systolic and diastolic blood pressure, cfPWV, and AIx@75) responses to MICT were not significantly different among the early-follicular, late-follicular, and mid-luteal phases of the MC ( P ≥0.1; phase x time) and between the active and placebo OC phases ( P ≥0.4; phase x time). When comparing the acute vascular responses to MICT vs. HIIT, we found that central systolic and diastolic blood pressure, cfPWV, and AIx@75 did not change differently in response to MICT vs. HIIT across the MC ( P ≥0.2; exercise type x phase x time) and OC ( P ≥0.5; exercise type x phase x time). In conclusion, we have demonstrated in healthy young premenopausal women that the acute arterial stiffness, wave reflection, and central blood pressure responses to MICT: 1) are not influenced by hormonal fluctuations among the early-follicular, late-follicular, and mid-luteal MC phases; 2) are not influenced by hormonal differences between the active and placebo OC phases; and 3) are not different compared to the acute vascular responses to HIIT across the MC and OC. This abstract was presented at the American Physiology Summit 2025 and is only available in HTML format. There is no downloadable file or PDF version. The Physiology editorial board was not involved in the peer review process.

PhysiologyVol. 40(S1)
University of Florida (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.