A Comparison of the Translation Styles and Lexical Choices of Underwood and Gale in Two Korean Versions of Tŏkhye immun 德慧入門

This study discusses the differences in translation style and choice of terms in two Korean translations of Dehui rumen (The gate of virtue and wisdom) and how these differences reveal the rapid changes taking place in the Korean language at the time. The translators, Horace Grant Underwood (1859–1916) and James Scarth Gale (1863–1937), adhered to different translation styles. In his 1915 translation, Underwood translated the original content using phrasal structures and native Korean and omitted nothing from the original. In contrast, in his 1927 translation, Gale often omitted the original content and added expressions not present in the source text. In addition, he tended to use sinographic terms and noun forms rather than paraphrases. I argue that these differences in translation style are due to Gale’s belief that “thought translation” (as opposed to “word translation”) helped readers better understand the book and that this led to his introduction of a variety of new terms to Korean speakers.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Acta Koreana
Published
2024-12-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18399/acta.2024.27.2.006
Primary Topic
Traditional Chinese Medicine Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Comparison of the Translation Styles and Lexical Choices of Underwood and Gale in Two Korean Versions of Tŏkhye immun 德慧入門

Donghyeon Lim
Acta Koreana
Traditional Chinese Medicine Studies
article

A Comparison of the Translation Styles and Lexical Choices of Underwood and Gale in Two Korean Versions of Tŏkhye immun 德慧入門

Donghyeon Lim
article en

Abstract

This study discusses the differences in translation style and choice of terms in two Korean translations of Dehui rumen (The gate of virtue and wisdom) and how these differences reveal the rapid changes taking place in the Korean language at the time. The translators, Horace Grant Underwood (1859–1916) and James Scarth Gale (1863–1937), adhered to different translation styles. In his 1915 translation, Underwood translated the original content using phrasal structures and native Korean and omitted nothing from the original. In contrast, in his 1927 translation, Gale often omitted the original content and added expressions not present in the source text. In addition, he tended to use sinographic terms and noun forms rather than paraphrases. I argue that these differences in translation style are due to Gale’s belief that “thought translation” (as opposed to “word translation”) helped readers better understand the book and that this led to his introduction of a variety of new terms to Korean speakers.

Acta KoreanaVol. 27(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 49%
Traditional Chinese Medicine Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.