Point-of-Care Ultrasound Within One Hour Associated with ED Flow and Resource Use in Non-Traumatic Abdominal Pain: A Retrospective Observational Study

<b>Background:</b> Although the value of point-of-care ultrasound (PoCUS) is well-established for specific diseases and in the hands of trained users, its broader impact on overall ED efficiency is not yet fully known. This study aims to evaluate the association of early PoCUS, performed within 1 h of presentation, with ED patient flow, healthcare resource utilization, and quality of care in adults with non-traumatic abdominal pain. <b>Method:</b> This retrospective cohort study included 44,863 adult patients (≥18 years) presenting with non-traumatic abdominal pain from January 2021 to December 2023. Patients were grouped into PoCUS and no-PoCUS categories, with a subgroup analysis for those receiving PoCUS within 1 h, to evaluate ED LOS, and costs for different ED dispositions. Outcomes measured included hospital LOS, costs, mortality, and ICU admission. <b>Results:</b> The mean age of the subjects was 44.4 ± 17.9 years, and 61.2% were female. PoCUS was performed in 39.7% of cases, with 69.6% of these conducted within one hour. Additionally, 30.5% underwent CT. The PoCUS group had a significantly shorter ED LOS compared to the no-PoCUS group among patients admitted to general wards (<i>p</i> < 0.001), but not in outpatient dispositions (<i>p</i> = 0.282) or ICU admissions (<i>p</i> = 0.081). Subgroup analysis of patients receiving PoCUS within 1 h showed a significantly shorter LOS for both outpatient dispositions (<i>p</i> < 0.001) and general ward admissions (<i>p</i> < 0.001), with no effect on ICU admissions (<i>p</i> = 0.869). The presence or absence of CT did not alter these findings. Multivariable analysis indicated that patients who received PoCUS within one hour alone at index visit and admitted after an unscheduled return visit had lower initial ED costs (-9436.1 TWD, <i>p</i> < 0.001) and shorter ED LOS (-11.59 min, <i>p</i> < 0.001) than patients admitted directly at the index visit, with no significant increase in total resource utilization or adverse outcomes after return visits. <b>Conclusions:</b> PoCUS, especially when performed within one hour, was associated with reduced ED LOS and healthcare resource utilization for both outpatient dispositions and inpatient admissions without compromising patient safety or quality of care.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Diagnostics
Published
2025-06-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics15131580
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Ultrasound in Clinical Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.64

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Point-of-Care Ultrasound Within One Hour Associated with ED Flow and Resource Use in Non-Traumatic Abdominal Pain: A Retrospective Observational Study

Wan‐Ching Lien, Wei-Jun Lin, Shih‐Ya Hung, Shih-Hao Wu et al.
3 citations
Diagnostics
Ultrasound in Clinical Applications
4.64
article

Point-of-Care Ultrasound Within One Hour Associated with ED Flow and Resource Use in Non-Traumatic Abdominal Pain: A Retrospective Observational Study

Wan‐Ching Lien, Wei-Jun Lin, Shih‐Ya Hung, Shih-Hao Wu, Fen-Wei Huang, Tse-Chyuan Wong, Te‐Fa Chiu
article en
3 citations

Abstract

<b>Background:</b> Although the value of point-of-care ultrasound (PoCUS) is well-established for specific diseases and in the hands of trained users, its broader impact on overall ED efficiency is not yet fully known. This study aims to evaluate the association of early PoCUS, performed within 1 h of presentation, with ED patient flow, healthcare resource utilization, and quality of care in adults with non-traumatic abdominal pain. <b>Method:</b> This retrospective cohort study included 44,863 adult patients (≥18 years) presenting with non-traumatic abdominal pain from January 2021 to December 2023. Patients were grouped into PoCUS and no-PoCUS categories, with a subgroup analysis for those receiving PoCUS within 1 h, to evaluate ED LOS, and costs for different ED dispositions. Outcomes measured included hospital LOS, costs, mortality, and ICU admission. <b>Results:</b> The mean age of the subjects was 44.4 ± 17.9 years, and 61.2% were female. PoCUS was performed in 39.7% of cases, with 69.6% of these conducted within one hour. Additionally, 30.5% underwent CT. The PoCUS group had a significantly shorter ED LOS compared to the no-PoCUS group among patients admitted to general wards (<i>p</i> < 0.001), but not in outpatient dispositions (<i>p</i> = 0.282) or ICU admissions (<i>p</i> = 0.081). Subgroup analysis of patients receiving PoCUS within 1 h showed a significantly shorter LOS for both outpatient dispositions (<i>p</i> < 0.001) and general ward admissions (<i>p</i> < 0.001), with no effect on ICU admissions (<i>p</i> = 0.869). The presence or absence of CT did not alter these findings. Multivariable analysis indicated that patients who received PoCUS within one hour alone at index visit and admitted after an unscheduled return visit had lower initial ED costs (-9436.1 TWD, <i>p</i> < 0.001) and shorter ED LOS (-11.59 min, <i>p</i> < 0.001) than patients admitted directly at the index visit, with no significant increase in total resource utilization or adverse outcomes after return visits. <b>Conclusions:</b> PoCUS, especially when performed within one hour, was associated with reduced ED LOS and healthcare resource utilization for both outpatient dispositions and inpatient admissions without compromising patient safety or quality of care.

DiagnosticsVol. 15(13)
National Taiwan University (TW), China Medical University (TW), China Medical University Hospital (TW), National Taiwan University Hospital (TW)
China Medical University Hospital, China Medical University
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Ultrasound in Clinical Applications
4.64
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.