Trends and Protocols in Orthodontic Finishing: A Cross-sectional Study

Introduction: The finishing stage of orthodontic treatment is a crucial step toward optimizing treatment outcomes. Orthodontists tend to follow different trends and protocols to achieve their planned outcomes. This study investigated orthodontists’ preferences while finishing and detailing their cases. Materials and Methods: This cross-sectional study included a questionnaire survey of 33 multiple-choice questions. The questionnaires were shared with the participants through an online platform. Data encompassing sociodemographic status, different bracket bonding strategies, and finishing practices were collected and analyzed. In total, 257 responses were obtained. Results: Of all the responding orthodontists, 62% preferred to set the incisal edges of the upper central incisors and canines at the same level, and both preferred to be more incisal to the lateral incisors. Of all the respondents, 13% preferred to use a positioner after debonding, 72% always preferred to set the marginal ridges of the molars and premolars at the same level, and 84% preferred to finish their cases with minimal anterior overjet. Based on panoramic X-ray results, 80% of the orthodontists chose to set the roots of the maxillary and mandibular teeth at the right angle to the occlusal plane and to have them parallel to each other. Open bite cases were overcorrected by 80% of the respondents, followed by deep bite and class III cases. Conclusion: Variations were noted in the ways in which orthodontists dealt with orthodontic cases in terms of finishing and detailing. Scientific evidence-based guidelines are required to achieve optimal orthodontic results.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the International Clinical Dental Research Organization
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4103/jicdro.jicdro_22_25
Primary Topic
Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Trends and Protocols in Orthodontic Finishing: A Cross-sectional Study

Hamad Hadi Al-Qahtani
1 links
Journal of the International Clinical Dental Research Organization
Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
article

Trends and Protocols in Orthodontic Finishing: A Cross-sectional Study

Hamad Hadi Al-Qahtani
article en

Abstract

Introduction: The finishing stage of orthodontic treatment is a crucial step toward optimizing treatment outcomes. Orthodontists tend to follow different trends and protocols to achieve their planned outcomes. This study investigated orthodontists’ preferences while finishing and detailing their cases. Materials and Methods: This cross-sectional study included a questionnaire survey of 33 multiple-choice questions. The questionnaires were shared with the participants through an online platform. Data encompassing sociodemographic status, different bracket bonding strategies, and finishing practices were collected and analyzed. In total, 257 responses were obtained. Results: Of all the responding orthodontists, 62% preferred to set the incisal edges of the upper central incisors and canines at the same level, and both preferred to be more incisal to the lateral incisors. Of all the respondents, 13% preferred to use a positioner after debonding, 72% always preferred to set the marginal ridges of the molars and premolars at the same level, and 84% preferred to finish their cases with minimal anterior overjet. Based on panoramic X-ray results, 80% of the orthodontists chose to set the roots of the maxillary and mandibular teeth at the right angle to the occlusal plane and to have them parallel to each other. Open bite cases were overcorrected by 80% of the respondents, followed by deep bite and class III cases. Conclusion: Variations were noted in the ways in which orthodontists dealt with orthodontic cases in terms of finishing and detailing. Scientific evidence-based guidelines are required to achieve optimal orthodontic results.

Journal of the International Clinical Dental Research OrganizationVol. 17(1)
King Abdulaziz University (SA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 85%
Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.