How design students construct electronic circuit designs for tiny interactive prototypes: A study in an undergraduate course

Our ability to study, develop, and innovate has drastically transformed with the advent of maker technology and personal fabrication. An increasing number of people have used a wide variety of these creative technologies in recent years. Creating an electronic circuit inside a tiny prototype can be challenging for design students. Studies on design students’ circuit assembly tasks on tiny prototypes are scarce. This study investigated how students assemble circuits in tiny prototyping and which factors influence these activities. Our interview study involved undergraduate students using technologies to prototype interactivities at a design school. We analyzed the students’ prototypes and discussions using the grounded theory framework. We observed that tiny prototype circuits might be characterised by volume, composition, structure, dynamics, and isolating properties. These properties might depend on the prototype's form factor, circuit routing needs, circuit base material, and circuit flexibility. Planning, experimenting, and the varied availability of conductive and circuit support materials might facilitate experimentation during circuit design. Our results shed light on the need for additional study and the development of boards and electronic componentry for educational practitioners.

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-06-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1145/3698061.3734400
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Teaching and Learning Programming
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.69
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How design students construct electronic circuit designs for tiny interactive prototypes: A study in an undergraduate course

1 citations
Teaching and Learning Programming
1.69
article

How design students construct electronic circuit designs for tiny interactive prototypes: A study in an undergraduate course

article en
1 citations

Abstract

Our ability to study, develop, and innovate has drastically transformed with the advent of maker technology and personal fabrication. An increasing number of people have used a wide variety of these creative technologies in recent years. Creating an electronic circuit inside a tiny prototype can be challenging for design students. Studies on design students’ circuit assembly tasks on tiny prototypes are scarce. This study investigated how students assemble circuits in tiny prototyping and which factors influence these activities. Our interview study involved undergraduate students using technologies to prototype interactivities at a design school. We analyzed the students’ prototypes and discussions using the grounded theory framework. We observed that tiny prototype circuits might be characterised by volume, composition, structure, dynamics, and isolating properties. These properties might depend on the prototype's form factor, circuit routing needs, circuit base material, and circuit flexibility. Planning, experimenting, and the varied availability of conductive and circuit support materials might facilitate experimentation during circuit design. Our results shed light on the need for additional study and the development of boards and electronic componentry for educational practitioners.

University of Urbino (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Teaching and Learning Programming
1.69
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

How design students construct electronic circuit designs for tiny interactive prototypes: A study in an undergraduate course · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS