Can AI Take a Joke—Or Make One? A Study of Humor Generation and Recognition in LLMs

Knowing when to joke-and when not to-is a subtle skill often missing in large language models (LLMs).This study examines how well LLMs generate and recognize humor in emotionally sensitive, support-oriented conversations.We introduce two targeted datasets: one for evaluating humor generation across distinct styles, and another for testing humor and speaker role recognition in human-written supportive statements.Using GPT-4o, LLaMA3, and Gemini 1.5, we assess humor style alignment, emotional appropriateness, and role sensitivity.While models produce fluent and stylistically varied humor, they often struggle with contextual nuance and role interpretation.GPT-4o consistently performs best in tone alignment and emotional fit, but subtle humor types remain challenging across models.These results highlight current limitations in LLMs' pragmatic and relational understanding, underscoring the importance of human oversight in humor-sensitive applications.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-06-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1145/3698061.3734388
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Humor Studies and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.88
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Can AI Take a Joke—Or Make One? A Study of Humor Generation and Recognition in LLMs

Jessie Chin, K. Quan, Priyadharshini Ramakrishnan
2 citations
Humor Studies and Applications
4.88
article

Can AI Take a Joke—Or Make One? A Study of Humor Generation and Recognition in LLMs

Jessie Chin, K. Quan, Priyadharshini Ramakrishnan
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Knowing when to joke-and when not to-is a subtle skill often missing in large language models (LLMs).This study examines how well LLMs generate and recognize humor in emotionally sensitive, support-oriented conversations.We introduce two targeted datasets: one for evaluating humor generation across distinct styles, and another for testing humor and speaker role recognition in human-written supportive statements.Using GPT-4o, LLaMA3, and Gemini 1.5, we assess humor style alignment, emotional appropriateness, and role sensitivity.While models produce fluent and stylistically varied humor, they often struggle with contextual nuance and role interpretation.GPT-4o consistently performs best in tone alignment and emotional fit, but subtle humor types remain challenging across models.These results highlight current limitations in LLMs' pragmatic and relational understanding, underscoring the importance of human oversight in humor-sensitive applications.

University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Humor Studies and Applications
4.88
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Can AI Take a Joke—Or Make One? A Study of Humor Generation and Recognition in LLMs — Jessie Chin, K. Quan, et al. · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS