Redefining plastic terminology: The urgent need for standardised definitions in science and policy

Plastic pollution is a pervasive global threat, yet efforts to mitigate it are hindered by inconsistent terminology across scientific, industrial, and policy domains. Key terms, such as “polymer,” “plastic,” and “macromolecule” are often used interchangeably despite distinct meanings. This semantic confusion undermines research integrity, muddles regulatory frameworks, and impedes effective environmental management. Without universally accepted definitions or a clear classification system, data comparability, policy implementation, and interdisciplinary collaboration are significantly compromised. This study systematically examines the scope and impact of terminological inconsistencies in plastics discourse. We conducted a structured review of recent (2020 – 2025) peer-reviewed literature spanning polymer science and environmental policy to assess how definitional ambiguity affects research outcomes and decision-making. The findings reveal that ambiguous usage of fundamental terms has led to misinterpretations in scientific studies, inconsistent policy decisions, and fragmented mitigation strategies. In response, we propose a standardization framework guided by the International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry principles, delineating clear criteria to distinguish polymers, plastics, and macromolecules. We recommend embedding these standardized definitions across academic publications, industry standards, and environmental policies to improve communication, ensure regulatory clarity, and support sustainable management practices. By establishing a coherent global terminology for plastics, this work underscores an urgent call for collective action. Standardizing the language of plastics will not only enhance data comparability and strengthen international policy initiatives, but also ensure that scientists, policymakers, and industry leaders can collaboratively craft effective, evidence-based solutions to plastic pollution.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Asian Journal of Water Environment and Pollution
Published
2025-06-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.36922/ajwep025200158
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Microplastics and Plastic Pollution
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.50
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Redefining plastic terminology: The urgent need for standardised definitions in science and policy

Austine Ofondu Chinomso Iroegbu, Emmanuel Rotimi Sadiku, Moipone Linda Teffo
1 citations
Asian Journal of Water Environment and Pollution
Microplastics and Plastic Pollution
0.50
article

Redefining plastic terminology: The urgent need for standardised definitions in science and policy

Austine Ofondu Chinomso Iroegbu, Emmanuel Rotimi Sadiku, Moipone Linda Teffo
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Plastic pollution is a pervasive global threat, yet efforts to mitigate it are hindered by inconsistent terminology across scientific, industrial, and policy domains. Key terms, such as “polymer,” “plastic,” and “macromolecule” are often used interchangeably despite distinct meanings. This semantic confusion undermines research integrity, muddles regulatory frameworks, and impedes effective environmental management. Without universally accepted definitions or a clear classification system, data comparability, policy implementation, and interdisciplinary collaboration are significantly compromised. This study systematically examines the scope and impact of terminological inconsistencies in plastics discourse. We conducted a structured review of recent (2020 – 2025) peer-reviewed literature spanning polymer science and environmental policy to assess how definitional ambiguity affects research outcomes and decision-making. The findings reveal that ambiguous usage of fundamental terms has led to misinterpretations in scientific studies, inconsistent policy decisions, and fragmented mitigation strategies. In response, we propose a standardization framework guided by the International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry principles, delineating clear criteria to distinguish polymers, plastics, and macromolecules. We recommend embedding these standardized definitions across academic publications, industry standards, and environmental policies to improve communication, ensure regulatory clarity, and support sustainable management practices. By establishing a coherent global terminology for plastics, this work underscores an urgent call for collective action. Standardizing the language of plastics will not only enhance data comparability and strengthen international policy initiatives, but also ensure that scientists, policymakers, and industry leaders can collaboratively craft effective, evidence-based solutions to plastic pollution.

Asian Journal of Water Environment and PollutionVol. 22(3)
Openalex Percentile: Top 39%
Microplastics and Plastic Pollution
0.50
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.