Basel III Capital Requirements and Lending: The Case of the D‐SIB Capital Buffer in Thailand

This study attempts to measure the endogeneity‐prone effects of the implementation of the domestic systemically important bank (D‐SIB) capital buffer in Thailand by creating a synthetic control for each D‐SIB. The main findings suggest that the D‐SIBs responded to the D‐SIB capital buffer differently, depending on the relative size of the portfolios with higher risk weights. Specifically, the D‐SIB with the highest proportion of business loans in its portfolio decreased lending growth more than the other two D‐SIBs, whereas the D‐SIB with the highest proportion of retail loans did not significantly decrease lending growth. In addition, the state‐owned commercial bank behaved differently from other banks such that synthetic controls cannot be created to replicate the unique behavior. While this study finds no significant effects on capital and risk‐weighted assets in the short run, it cannot rule out the possibility of the D‐SIBs raising more capital in the longer run.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Developing Economies
Published
2025-06-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/deve.12444
Primary Topic
Banking stability, regulation, efficiency
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Basel III Capital Requirements and Lending: The Case of the D‐SIB Capital Buffer in Thailand

Attavit Prachakseranee
The Developing Economies
Banking stability, regulation, efficiency
article

Basel III Capital Requirements and Lending: The Case of the D‐SIB Capital Buffer in Thailand

Attavit Prachakseranee
article en

Abstract

This study attempts to measure the endogeneity‐prone effects of the implementation of the domestic systemically important bank (D‐SIB) capital buffer in Thailand by creating a synthetic control for each D‐SIB. The main findings suggest that the D‐SIBs responded to the D‐SIB capital buffer differently, depending on the relative size of the portfolios with higher risk weights. Specifically, the D‐SIB with the highest proportion of business loans in its portfolio decreased lending growth more than the other two D‐SIBs, whereas the D‐SIB with the highest proportion of retail loans did not significantly decrease lending growth. In addition, the state‐owned commercial bank behaved differently from other banks such that synthetic controls cannot be created to replicate the unique behavior. While this study finds no significant effects on capital and risk‐weighted assets in the short run, it cannot rule out the possibility of the D‐SIBs raising more capital in the longer run.

The Developing EconomiesVol. 63(3)
Kyoto University (JP)
Openalex Percentile: Top 81%
Banking stability, regulation, efficiency
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Basel III Capital Requirements and Lending: The Case of the D‐SIB Capital Buffer in Thailand — Attavit Prachakseranee · The Developing Economies (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS