The Premise of Intersectionality for Family Therapy Interventions With Asylum Seekers in the United States

Changes in migration policy and governmental systems have increased anti-immigration rhetoric and attitudes toward asylum seekers within the United States. Consequently, asylum-seeking families contend with changes in culture, relationships, and roles, which exacerbate experiences of trauma, isolation, and mental health symptoms. While the United States still harbors an atmosphere of racist nativism, postmigration stressors uncover other forms of structural oppression, such as heterosexism and genderism. Intersectionality serves as an indispensable theoretical framework to examine intersecting forces of oppression and how they accentuate asylum-seeking family experiences in therapy. To address sociopolitical experiences and oppression impacting the well-being and relationships of asylum-seeking families, the article (a) outlines key definitions and research trends on family relationships and interventions with asylum-seeking families; (b) elaborates intersectionality's core tenets; and (c) synthesizes applications from intersectionality to enhance asylum-seeking family interventions and research.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Marital and Family Therapy
Published
2025-06-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/jmft.70047
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Migration, Health and Trauma
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.61
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Premise of Intersectionality for Family Therapy Interventions With Asylum Seekers in the United States

Connie T. Jones, Chanel Shahnami Rodriguez, Christian D. Chan
2 citations
Journal of Marital and Family Therapy
Migration, Health and Trauma
4.61
article

The Premise of Intersectionality for Family Therapy Interventions With Asylum Seekers in the United States

Connie T. Jones, Chanel Shahnami Rodriguez, Christian D. Chan
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Changes in migration policy and governmental systems have increased anti-immigration rhetoric and attitudes toward asylum seekers within the United States. Consequently, asylum-seeking families contend with changes in culture, relationships, and roles, which exacerbate experiences of trauma, isolation, and mental health symptoms. While the United States still harbors an atmosphere of racist nativism, postmigration stressors uncover other forms of structural oppression, such as heterosexism and genderism. Intersectionality serves as an indispensable theoretical framework to examine intersecting forces of oppression and how they accentuate asylum-seeking family experiences in therapy. To address sociopolitical experiences and oppression impacting the well-being and relationships of asylum-seeking families, the article (a) outlines key definitions and research trends on family relationships and interventions with asylum-seeking families; (b) elaborates intersectionality's core tenets; and (c) synthesizes applications from intersectionality to enhance asylum-seeking family interventions and research.

Journal of Marital and Family TherapyVol. 51(3)
University of North Carolina at Greensboro (US), Marymount University (US)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Migration, Health and Trauma
4.61
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The Premise of Intersectionality for Family Therapy Interventions With Asylum Seekers in the United States — Connie T. Jones, Chanel Shahnami Rodriguez, et al. · Journal of Marital and Family Therapy (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS