Computational model predicts function of Rho‐GTPase binding for plexin receptor <scp>GAP</scp> activity on Rap1b via dynamic allosteric changes

Plexin-semaphorin signaling regulates key processes such as cell migration, neuronal development, angiogenesis, and immune responses. Plexins stand out because they can directly bind with both Rho- and Ras-family small GTPases through their intracellular domains when these GTPases are in their active, GTP-bound states. This binding occurs via intracellular regions, which include a Rho-GTPase binding domain and a GTPase-activating protein (GAP) segment. Studies have shown that Rho and Ras GTPases play vital roles in plexin signaling and activation. However, the structural dynamics of plexins and GTPases and how these conformational changes affect interactions when plexin is bound with both Ras and Rho-GTPases or bound to only one specific GTPase have remained unclear. In this study, we conducted molecular dynamics simulations on six distinct plexin-GTPase bound systems to investigate the differences in conformations and dynamics between plexin-B1 and three GTPases: Rap1b, Rnd1, and Rac1. Our analysis revealed that dynamics with Rac1 are more altered compared to Rnd1, depending on whether plexin's GAP domain is bound or unbound to Rap1b. In addition, we further investigated alterations in network centralities and compared the network dynamics of the plexin-GTPase complexes, focusing on the differences when plexin is bound to both Ras (Rap1b) and Rho-GTPases (Rnd1/Rac1) versus when it is bound to only one GTPase. Our study revealed that Rnd1 exhibits stronger and more stable interactions with plexin-B1 in the absence of Rap1b, while Rac1 shows fewer and less stable connections in comparison. These computational models have features that broadly agree with experimental results from hydrogen-deuterium exchange detected by mass spectrometry. Such insights provide a better understanding of the molecular mechanisms underlying plexin-GTPase interactions and the complexities of signaling mechanisms involving GTPases in general.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Protein Science
Published
2025-06-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/pro.70196
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Axon Guidance and Neuronal Signaling
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.82

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Computational model predicts function of Rho‐GTPase binding for plexin receptor GAP activity on Rap1b via dynamic allosteric changes

Amita R. Sahoo, Paul B. Savage, Nisha Bhattarai, Matthias Buck et al.
2 citations
Protein Science
Axon Guidance and Neuronal Signaling
1.82
article

Computational model predicts function of Rho‐GTPase binding for plexin receptor GAP activity on Rap1b via dynamic allosteric changes

Amita R. Sahoo, Paul B. Savage, Nisha Bhattarai, Matthias Buck, Angela Gabriella Gomes, Lindsay Morrison
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Plexin-semaphorin signaling regulates key processes such as cell migration, neuronal development, angiogenesis, and immune responses. Plexins stand out because they can directly bind with both Rho- and Ras-family small GTPases through their intracellular domains when these GTPases are in their active, GTP-bound states. This binding occurs via intracellular regions, which include a Rho-GTPase binding domain and a GTPase-activating protein (GAP) segment. Studies have shown that Rho and Ras GTPases play vital roles in plexin signaling and activation. However, the structural dynamics of plexins and GTPases and how these conformational changes affect interactions when plexin is bound with both Ras and Rho-GTPases or bound to only one specific GTPase have remained unclear. In this study, we conducted molecular dynamics simulations on six distinct plexin-GTPase bound systems to investigate the differences in conformations and dynamics between plexin-B1 and three GTPases: Rap1b, Rnd1, and Rac1. Our analysis revealed that dynamics with Rac1 are more altered compared to Rnd1, depending on whether plexin's GAP domain is bound or unbound to Rap1b. In addition, we further investigated alterations in network centralities and compared the network dynamics of the plexin-GTPase complexes, focusing on the differences when plexin is bound to both Ras (Rap1b) and Rho-GTPases (Rnd1/Rac1) versus when it is bound to only one GTPase. Our study revealed that Rnd1 exhibits stronger and more stable interactions with plexin-B1 in the absence of Rap1b, while Rac1 shows fewer and less stable connections in comparison. These computational models have features that broadly agree with experimental results from hydrogen-deuterium exchange detected by mass spectrometry. Such insights provide a better understanding of the molecular mechanisms underlying plexin-GTPase interactions and the complexities of signaling mechanisms involving GTPases in general.

Protein ScienceVol. 34(7)
Waters (United States) (US), Case Western Reserve University (US)
National Institutes of Health
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Axon Guidance and Neuronal Signaling
1.82
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.