ChatGPT in Academic Writing: A Scientometric Analysis of Literature Published Between 2022 and 2023

This paper reviews the disruptive role of ChatGPT in academic writing, focusing on its implications for scholarly practices and emerging ethical challenges. Using document co-citation analysis (DCA), it maps the thematic and intellectual structure of the discourse on ChatGPT in academic knowledge production. Drawing on a dataset of 171 peer-reviewed articles from Scopus, the analysis, conducted using CiteSpace, identified 10 major thematic clusters, including ethical risks, practical applications, and pedagogical innovations. The resulting high-modularity network (<i>Q</i> = 0.8989, <i>S</i> = 0.9466), comprising 866 nodes and 2,274 edges, ensured methodological rigor and thematic clarity. The findings reveal widespread recognition of ChatGPT's value in enhancing writing and supporting innovative educational frameworks, especially for non-native speakers. Concerns persist regarding hallucinated references, plagiarism, authorship ethics, and the reliability of AI-detection tools. Our paper accentuates the need for proactive oversight and policy development to ensure responsible integration of generative AI in research and education.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics
Published
2025-06-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/15562646251350203
Citations
13
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.51

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

ChatGPT in Academic Writing: A Scientometric Analysis of Literature Published Between 2022 and 2023

Gergely Ferenc Lendvai
13 citations
Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
8.51
article

ChatGPT in Academic Writing: A Scientometric Analysis of Literature Published Between 2022 and 2023

Gergely Ferenc Lendvai
article en
13 citations

Abstract

This paper reviews the disruptive role of ChatGPT in academic writing, focusing on its implications for scholarly practices and emerging ethical challenges. Using document co-citation analysis (DCA), it maps the thematic and intellectual structure of the discourse on ChatGPT in academic knowledge production. Drawing on a dataset of 171 peer-reviewed articles from Scopus, the analysis, conducted using CiteSpace, identified 10 major thematic clusters, including ethical risks, practical applications, and pedagogical innovations. The resulting high-modularity network (<i>Q</i> = 0.8989, <i>S</i> = 0.9466), comprising 866 nodes and 2,274 edges, ensured methodological rigor and thematic clarity. The findings reveal widespread recognition of ChatGPT's value in enhancing writing and supporting innovative educational frameworks, especially for non-native speakers. Concerns persist regarding hallucinated references, plagiarism, authorship ethics, and the reliability of AI-detection tools. Our paper accentuates the need for proactive oversight and policy development to ensure responsible integration of generative AI in research and education.

Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research EthicsVol. 20(3)
Ludovika University of Public Service (HU)
Nemzeti Kutatási, Fejlesztési és Innovaciós Alap
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
8.51
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.