Learning English in China: The Earlier, the Better?

ABSTRACT This study examined the relationship of university students’ English proficiency to the age at which they started learning English in mainland China. With the data collected from 4530 students in 50 universities in 24 different provinces or municipalities, we employed a multiple regression model to investigate (a) whether the tested English score in the national entrance exam was predicted by the age at which the students started learning English and (b) whether the start age of English learning influences the association between time invested and learning outcome. Our results found that students who began learning English in third grade predicted significantly lower scores than those who started in kindergarten. However, no such significance of “advantage” was observed in earlier starts from kindergarten over Grade 1. Although the main effect of total learning duration was not significant, its interaction effect suggests that students who start learning later benefit more from longer durations of English input and tend to catch up quickly and show faster growth. These findings conflict with the ‘the earlier, the better’ assumption in language learning and further raise the question to what degree foreign language education should prioritize starting early versus focusing on quality and positive affect.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Applied Linguistics
Published
2025-06-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/ijal.12778
Primary Topic
EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Learning English in China: The Earlier, the Better?

Joseph McIntyre, Catherine E. Snow, Jun Zhang, Si Chen et al.
International Journal of Applied Linguistics
EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
article

Learning English in China: The Earlier, the Better?

Joseph McIntyre, Catherine E. Snow, Jun Zhang, Si Chen, Jing Jin
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT This study examined the relationship of university students’ English proficiency to the age at which they started learning English in mainland China. With the data collected from 4530 students in 50 universities in 24 different provinces or municipalities, we employed a multiple regression model to investigate (a) whether the tested English score in the national entrance exam was predicted by the age at which the students started learning English and (b) whether the start age of English learning influences the association between time invested and learning outcome. Our results found that students who began learning English in third grade predicted significantly lower scores than those who started in kindergarten. However, no such significance of “advantage” was observed in earlier starts from kindergarten over Grade 1. Although the main effect of total learning duration was not significant, its interaction effect suggests that students who start learning later benefit more from longer durations of English input and tend to catch up quickly and show faster growth. These findings conflict with the ‘the earlier, the better’ assumption in language learning and further raise the question to what degree foreign language education should prioritize starting early versus focusing on quality and positive affect.

International Journal of Applied LinguisticsVol. 36(1)
University of London (GB), Chinese University of Hong Kong (HK), King's College London (GB), Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine (CN), Hebei Normal University (CN)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 81%
EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.