The Stress-Response Costs in Decision Making

Incoming information brings in news which could be neutral, good, or bad. However, the brain and the body’s response to bad news is much stronger and sustained. Bad news may trigger the human stress-response system which creates a chemical bath in both the brain and the body. In particular, the stress hormone, cortisol, is released, which provides a quick boost of energy to the body and the brain. However, repeated or continuous exposure to cortisol exacts substantial costs on both the brain and the body. We argue that it is implausible to assume that the brain, which ultimately is the seat of all decision-making, completely ignores all such costs. In this article, we show that the inclusion of such costs provides a unified explanation for the Allais paradox and the Ellsberg paradox and makes predictions that are empirically supported. We further show that such costs potentially contribute to high and countercyclical equity-premia.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Theoretical Economics Letters
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4236/tel.2025.153041
Primary Topic
Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Stress-Response Costs in Decision Making

Hammad Siddiqi
Theoretical Economics Letters
Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
article

The Stress-Response Costs in Decision Making

Hammad Siddiqi
article en

Abstract

Incoming information brings in news which could be neutral, good, or bad. However, the brain and the body’s response to bad news is much stronger and sustained. Bad news may trigger the human stress-response system which creates a chemical bath in both the brain and the body. In particular, the stress hormone, cortisol, is released, which provides a quick boost of energy to the body and the brain. However, repeated or continuous exposure to cortisol exacts substantial costs on both the brain and the body. We argue that it is implausible to assume that the brain, which ultimately is the seat of all decision-making, completely ignores all such costs. In this article, we show that the inclusion of such costs provides a unified explanation for the Allais paradox and the Ellsberg paradox and makes predictions that are empirically supported. We further show that such costs potentially contribute to high and countercyclical equity-premia.

Theoretical Economics LettersVol. 15(03)
University of the Sunshine Coast (AU)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 82%
Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The Stress-Response Costs in Decision Making — Hammad Siddiqi · Theoretical Economics Letters (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS