A Climate – Responsive Conceptual Framework for Assessing Water Ecological Carrying Capacity in Urban Watershed

Rapid urbanization and climate variability have degraded water quality and reduced the resilience of urban watershed. This study proposes a climate-responsive conceptual framework for assessing Water Ecological Carrying Capacity (WECC) in urban environments. The framework integrates hydro – climatic indicators, urban – climatic dynamics, and adaptive policy interventions, structured within the Driver–Pressure–State–Impact–Response (DPSIR) model. It is designed to evaluate the dynamic interactions between urban growth, climate variability, and freshwater ecosystem thresholds. A systematic review of 14 studies from Asia and beyond provides empirical support for the framework. Indicators such as streamflow variability, urban land use, water temperature, and governance capacity are categorized within the DPSIR components to illustrate the multifaceted nature of WECC. The study highlights how hydro – climatic and socio – economic stressors interact to influence the vulnerability and resilience of water ecosystems. Figures and tables within the paper visualize these interactions and simulate feedback loops under various environmental and policy scenarios. While the model presents a comprehensive and adaptable framework, it is based on secondary data and lacks validation through localized, real-time application. Nevertheless, it serves as a strategic tool for anticipating and addressing urban water sustainability challenges. It encourages the use of integrated, climate – informed planning approaches and provides a foundation for future research and policy in climate – sensitive regions. This study underscores the importance of evaluating WECC not as a static measure but as a dynamic function shaped by ecological, social, and climatic processes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
INFOMATEK
Published
2025-06-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.23969/infomatek.v27i1.26837
Primary Topic
Water resources management and optimization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Climate – Responsive Conceptual Framework for Assessing Water Ecological Carrying Capacity in Urban Watershed

Astari Minarti, Winnie Septiani, Melati Ferianita Fachrul, Astri Rinanti et al.
1 links
INFOMATEK
Water resources management and optimization
article

A Climate – Responsive Conceptual Framework for Assessing Water Ecological Carrying Capacity in Urban Watershed

Astari Minarti, Winnie Septiani, Melati Ferianita Fachrul, Astri Rinanti, Diana Irvindiaty Hendrawan
article en

Abstract

Rapid urbanization and climate variability have degraded water quality and reduced the resilience of urban watershed. This study proposes a climate-responsive conceptual framework for assessing Water Ecological Carrying Capacity (WECC) in urban environments. The framework integrates hydro – climatic indicators, urban – climatic dynamics, and adaptive policy interventions, structured within the Driver–Pressure–State–Impact–Response (DPSIR) model. It is designed to evaluate the dynamic interactions between urban growth, climate variability, and freshwater ecosystem thresholds. A systematic review of 14 studies from Asia and beyond provides empirical support for the framework. Indicators such as streamflow variability, urban land use, water temperature, and governance capacity are categorized within the DPSIR components to illustrate the multifaceted nature of WECC. The study highlights how hydro – climatic and socio – economic stressors interact to influence the vulnerability and resilience of water ecosystems. Figures and tables within the paper visualize these interactions and simulate feedback loops under various environmental and policy scenarios. While the model presents a comprehensive and adaptable framework, it is based on secondary data and lacks validation through localized, real-time application. Nevertheless, it serves as a strategic tool for anticipating and addressing urban water sustainability challenges. It encourages the use of integrated, climate – informed planning approaches and provides a foundation for future research and policy in climate – sensitive regions. This study underscores the importance of evaluating WECC not as a static measure but as a dynamic function shaped by ecological, social, and climatic processes.

INFOMATEKVol. 27(1)
Universitas Trisakti (ID)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 82%
Water resources management and optimization
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A Climate – Responsive Conceptual Framework for Assessing Water Ecological Carrying Capacity in Urban Watershed — Astari Minarti, Winnie Septiani, et al. · INFOMATEK (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS