Comparison of mass-timber and RC buildings in terms of seismic performance, LCA, and cost in Türkiye

Abstract The two devastating earthquakes of 6 February 2023 in Kahramanmaraş, Türkiye, highlighted the poor seismic performance of many existing reinforced concrete (RC) buildings and created an urgent need for rapid, large-scale reconstruction. This study evaluates the feasibility of using a modern mass-timber structural system as an alternative to conventional RC construction for mid-rise residential buildings in Turkish seismic regions. A seven-story residential building was designed in two forms – one with a standard RC shear-wall structure and one with an equivalent mass-timber (cross-laminated timber, CLT) structure – and compared their seismic performance, environmental impacts, and construction costs. Nonlinear static (pushover) and response spectrum analyses were conducted for both designs in accordance with applicable seismic design standards. A cradle-to-gate life-cycle assessment (LCA) was performed to quantify embodied carbon and energy, and a cost analysis was carried out using local 2023 material prices. The CLT building achieved adequate seismic performance, with fundamental periods about twice as long as the RC building and base shear forces roughly one-third as large. Although the CLT structure experienced larger lateral drifts, these remained within serviceable limits. In terms of sustainability, the mass-timber design showed dramatically lower environmental impacts – roughly an order of magnitude reduction in embodied carbon and energy – compared to the RC design. The primary trade-off was economic: due to current material pricing and supply constraints, the mass-timber building’s estimated construction cost was approximately 5–6 times higher than the RC building. Overall, the results indicate that mass-timber is a structurally viable and environmentally advantageous option for post-earthquake reconstruction of mid-rise buildings in Türkiye, provided that issues of cost and material supply can be addressed through future policy and market developments.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering
Published
2025-06-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-025-02201-1
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Wood Treatment and Properties
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.01

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of mass-timber and RC buildings in terms of seismic performance, LCA, and cost in Türkiye

Kadir C. Sener, Özgür Anıl, Ekrem Mutlu
1 citations
Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering
Wood Treatment and Properties
1.01
article

Comparison of mass-timber and RC buildings in terms of seismic performance, LCA, and cost in Türkiye

Kadir C. Sener, Özgür Anıl, Ekrem Mutlu
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract The two devastating earthquakes of 6 February 2023 in Kahramanmaraş, Türkiye, highlighted the poor seismic performance of many existing reinforced concrete (RC) buildings and created an urgent need for rapid, large-scale reconstruction. This study evaluates the feasibility of using a modern mass-timber structural system as an alternative to conventional RC construction for mid-rise residential buildings in Turkish seismic regions. A seven-story residential building was designed in two forms – one with a standard RC shear-wall structure and one with an equivalent mass-timber (cross-laminated timber, CLT) structure – and compared their seismic performance, environmental impacts, and construction costs. Nonlinear static (pushover) and response spectrum analyses were conducted for both designs in accordance with applicable seismic design standards. A cradle-to-gate life-cycle assessment (LCA) was performed to quantify embodied carbon and energy, and a cost analysis was carried out using local 2023 material prices. The CLT building achieved adequate seismic performance, with fundamental periods about twice as long as the RC building and base shear forces roughly one-third as large. Although the CLT structure experienced larger lateral drifts, these remained within serviceable limits. In terms of sustainability, the mass-timber design showed dramatically lower environmental impacts – roughly an order of magnitude reduction in embodied carbon and energy – compared to the RC design. The primary trade-off was economic: due to current material pricing and supply constraints, the mass-timber building’s estimated construction cost was approximately 5–6 times higher than the RC building. Overall, the results indicate that mass-timber is a structurally viable and environmentally advantageous option for post-earthquake reconstruction of mid-rise buildings in Türkiye, provided that issues of cost and material supply can be addressed through future policy and market developments.

Bulletin of Earthquake EngineeringVol. 23(10)
Auburn University (US), Gazi University (TR)
Gazi Üniversitesi
Responsible consumption and production, Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Wood Treatment and Properties
1.01
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.