ON THE ISSUE OF PARTICIPATION OF PARTIES AND OTHER PARTICIPANTS IN CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS DURING THE COURT HEARING VIA VIDEOCONFERENCE, IN PARTICULAR USING PERSONAL TECHNICAL MEANS DURING MARTIAL LAW IN UKRAINE

The article is dedicated to examining the grounds and procedure for the participation of parties and other participants in criminal proceedings during court hearings via videoconference, particularly with the use of personal technical devices during the period of martial law in Ukraine.It outlines international standards for ensuring the participation of parties and other participants in criminal proceedings during court hearings via videoconference, based on the legal positions of the European Court of Human Rights and the Guidelines on Videoconferencing in Judicial Proceedings, adopted by the European Commission for the Efficiency of Justice (CEPEJ) at its 36th plenary meeting (June 16-17, 2021).Attention is drawn to the fact that all guarantees of a fair trial provided by the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms apply to remote hearings in all types of judicial proceedings.The key elements include the right to effective access to a court, fairness of the proceedings, adversarial nature of the process, equality of arms, proper handling of evidence, adequate time to prepare and access materials, the court's decision within a reasonable time, data protection, and risk management.It is emphasized that it is the court that must decide, within the framework of applicable law, whether a hearing should be held remotely to ensure overall fairness of the proceedings.The court must also ensure the party's right to effective legal assistance during all stages of the judicial process, including the confidentiality of communication with their lawyer.The article also analyzes judicial practice of local and appellate courts, as well as the Criminal Cassation Court of the Supreme Court, regarding the grounds and procedure for the participation of parties and other participants in criminal proceedings during court hearings via videoconference, particularly with the use of personal technical devices during the period of martial law in Ukraine.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Juridical scientific and electronic journal
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.32782/2524-0374/2025-5/54
Primary Topic
Law in Society and Culture
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

ON THE ISSUE OF PARTICIPATION OF PARTIES AND OTHER PARTICIPANTS IN CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS DURING THE COURT HEARING VIA VIDEOCONFERENCE, IN PARTICULAR USING PERSONAL TECHNICAL MEANS DURING MARTIAL LAW IN UKRAINE

O.V. Verkhoglyad-Gerasymenko
Juridical scientific and electronic journal
Law in Society and Culture
article

ON THE ISSUE OF PARTICIPATION OF PARTIES AND OTHER PARTICIPANTS IN CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS DURING THE COURT HEARING VIA VIDEOCONFERENCE, IN PARTICULAR USING PERSONAL TECHNICAL MEANS DURING MARTIAL LAW IN UKRAINE

O.V. Verkhoglyad-Gerasymenko
article en

Abstract

The article is dedicated to examining the grounds and procedure for the participation of parties and other participants in criminal proceedings during court hearings via videoconference, particularly with the use of personal technical devices during the period of martial law in Ukraine.It outlines international standards for ensuring the participation of parties and other participants in criminal proceedings during court hearings via videoconference, based on the legal positions of the European Court of Human Rights and the Guidelines on Videoconferencing in Judicial Proceedings, adopted by the European Commission for the Efficiency of Justice (CEPEJ) at its 36th plenary meeting (June 16-17, 2021).Attention is drawn to the fact that all guarantees of a fair trial provided by the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms apply to remote hearings in all types of judicial proceedings.The key elements include the right to effective access to a court, fairness of the proceedings, adversarial nature of the process, equality of arms, proper handling of evidence, adequate time to prepare and access materials, the court's decision within a reasonable time, data protection, and risk management.It is emphasized that it is the court that must decide, within the framework of applicable law, whether a hearing should be held remotely to ensure overall fairness of the proceedings.The court must also ensure the party's right to effective legal assistance during all stages of the judicial process, including the confidentiality of communication with their lawyer.The article also analyzes judicial practice of local and appellate courts, as well as the Criminal Cassation Court of the Supreme Court, regarding the grounds and procedure for the participation of parties and other participants in criminal proceedings during court hearings via videoconference, particularly with the use of personal technical devices during the period of martial law in Ukraine.

Juridical scientific and electronic journal(5)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 77%
Law in Society and Culture
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

ON THE ISSUE OF PARTICIPATION OF PARTIES AND OTHER PARTICIPANTS IN CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS DURING THE COURT HEARING VIA VIDEOCONFERENCE, IN PARTICULAR USING PERSONAL TECHNICAL MEANS DURING MARTIAL LAW IN UKRAINE — O.V. Verkhoglyad-Gerasymenko · Juridical scientific and electronic journal (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS