Power Dynamics in Classroom Communication: A Case Study of Primary School Teachers in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam

The article analyzes the manifestations of power in language communication of primary school teachers through a survey of actual speech at the Practical Primary School - Saigon University, combined with a questionnaire survey of 29 teachers. The study applies the discourse theory framework of Fairclough (2001), Foucault (1980) and the power classification system of French & Raven (1959) to identify three main types of power: legitimate, rewarding, and coercive. In addition to verbal factors, non-verbal factors such as tone, eye contact, and spatial distance also contribute to consolidating power in the classroom. The results show that power in teacher communication is a soft, flexible and constructive structure, directly affecting students' learning motivation, behavior, and classroom spirit. Keywords: Linguistic Power, Primary School Teachers, Pedagogical Communication, Classroom Discourse, Soft Power.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Applied Research in Social Sciences
Published
2025-06-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.51594/ijarss.v7i6.1950
Primary Topic
EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Power Dynamics in Classroom Communication: A Case Study of Primary School Teachers in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam

Veronika V. Kim
International Journal of Applied Research in Social Sciences
EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
article

Power Dynamics in Classroom Communication: A Case Study of Primary School Teachers in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam

Veronika V. Kim
article en

Abstract

The article analyzes the manifestations of power in language communication of primary school teachers through a survey of actual speech at the Practical Primary School - Saigon University, combined with a questionnaire survey of 29 teachers. The study applies the discourse theory framework of Fairclough (2001), Foucault (1980) and the power classification system of French & Raven (1959) to identify three main types of power: legitimate, rewarding, and coercive. In addition to verbal factors, non-verbal factors such as tone, eye contact, and spatial distance also contribute to consolidating power in the classroom. The results show that power in teacher communication is a soft, flexible and constructive structure, directly affecting students' learning motivation, behavior, and classroom spirit. Keywords: Linguistic Power, Primary School Teachers, Pedagogical Communication, Classroom Discourse, Soft Power.

International Journal of Applied Research in Social SciencesVol. 7(6)
Văn Hiến University (VN)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 81%
EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.