Field measurements of icing parameters and their application towards ice load maps: An overview

Ice load maps are used for the purposes of planning and design of infrastructure in ice-prone regions. They are obtained based on microphysical output from long-term numerical weather prediction model simulations. A common microphysics scheme used in such simulations is the Thompson “aerosol-aware” parameterization scheme implemented in the Weather Research Forecasting (WRF) model. The generation of ice load maps relies on a few key assumptions regarding icing parameters, primarily, that the Median Volume Diameter (MVD) can be accurately calculated using gamma distribution from the values of Cloud Droplet Number Concentrations (CDNC) and Liquid Water Content (LWC) from WRF. The validation of this assumption is hampered due to difficulties of measuring these parameters in field. Recent technological advancements allow for these measurements. Such a measurement campaign was carried out, and its results were implemented in an analytical scheme, mimicking that of an ice load map calculation scheme. The measurement results show that the assumed droplet concentration values are overestimated in WRF. The analytical calculations results show that the generalized gamma distributions in Thompson “aerosol-aware” scheme is adequate for representing icing conditions when supplied proper input data. The WRF results are deemed useful for further use in the generation of ice load maps, as-is, however, there are now open questions about how the newly observed characteristics and connections between CDNC, LWC and MVD can impact the icing rates in particular at such exposed maritime sites. A re-evaluation of the measured icing data on a finer time resolution scale and de-coupled from WRF model output may be warranted to improve the obtained results. However, modifications to the droplet activation parameterization of the Thompson “aerosol-aware” scheme and/or the background CCN concentrations would be required to reproduce the measured droplet distribution properties. • Ice load maps are used for the purposes of designing infrastructure in ice-prone regions. • The generation of ice load maps relies on a few key assumptions regarding icing parameters • The measurement results show that the assumed droplet concentration values are overestimated in WRF. • The analytical calculations results show that the generalized gamma is adequate for representing icing conditions when supplied proper input data. • However, modifications to the droplet activation parameterization of the Thompson “aerosol-aware” scheme and/or the background CCN concentrations would be required to reproduce the measured droplet distribution properties.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cold Regions Science and Technology
Published
2025-06-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coldregions.2025.104579
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Icing and De-icing Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
9.99

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Field measurements of icing parameters and their application towards ice load maps: An overview

Pavlo Sokolov, Bjørn Egil Kringlebotn Nygaard, Ville A. Kaikkonen, Muhammad S. Virk et al.
2 citations
Cold Regions Science and Technology
Icing and De-icing Technologies
9.99
article

Field measurements of icing parameters and their application towards ice load maps: An overview

Pavlo Sokolov, Bjørn Egil Kringlebotn Nygaard, Ville A. Kaikkonen, Muhammad S. Virk, Anssi Mäkynen, Eero O. Molkoselkä, Xingbo Han
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Ice load maps are used for the purposes of planning and design of infrastructure in ice-prone regions. They are obtained based on microphysical output from long-term numerical weather prediction model simulations. A common microphysics scheme used in such simulations is the Thompson “aerosol-aware” parameterization scheme implemented in the Weather Research Forecasting (WRF) model. The generation of ice load maps relies on a few key assumptions regarding icing parameters, primarily, that the Median Volume Diameter (MVD) can be accurately calculated using gamma distribution from the values of Cloud Droplet Number Concentrations (CDNC) and Liquid Water Content (LWC) from WRF. The validation of this assumption is hampered due to difficulties of measuring these parameters in field. Recent technological advancements allow for these measurements. Such a measurement campaign was carried out, and its results were implemented in an analytical scheme, mimicking that of an ice load map calculation scheme. The measurement results show that the assumed droplet concentration values are overestimated in WRF. The analytical calculations results show that the generalized gamma distributions in Thompson “aerosol-aware” scheme is adequate for representing icing conditions when supplied proper input data. The WRF results are deemed useful for further use in the generation of ice load maps, as-is, however, there are now open questions about how the newly observed characteristics and connections between CDNC, LWC and MVD can impact the icing rates in particular at such exposed maritime sites. A re-evaluation of the measured icing data on a finer time resolution scale and de-coupled from WRF model output may be warranted to improve the obtained results. However, modifications to the droplet activation parameterization of the Thompson “aerosol-aware” scheme and/or the background CCN concentrations would be required to reproduce the measured droplet distribution properties. • Ice load maps are used for the purposes of designing infrastructure in ice-prone regions. • The generation of ice load maps relies on a few key assumptions regarding icing parameters • The measurement results show that the assumed droplet concentration values are overestimated in WRF. • The analytical calculations results show that the generalized gamma is adequate for representing icing conditions when supplied proper input data. • However, modifications to the droplet activation parameterization of the Thompson “aerosol-aware” scheme and/or the background CCN concentrations would be required to reproduce the measured droplet distribution properties.

Cold Regions Science and TechnologyVol. 239
Kajaani University of Applied Sciences (FI), Norconsult (Norway) (NO), UiT The Arctic University of Norway (NO), University of Oulu (FI)
Norges Forskningsråd
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Icing and De-icing Technologies
9.99
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.