Evaluation of Characteristics and Ethnic Sensitivity for FDA‐Approved Drugs with Racial and Ethnic Differences in Pharmacokinetics, Safety, and Efficacy

Racial and ethnic differences in drug disposition and response may have a significant impact on its risk-benefit balance. Therefore, it is important to examine whether an investigational drug has characteristics that make the pharmacokinetics (PK), safety, and efficacy likely to be affected by intrinsic and extrinsic ethnic factors based on ethnic sensitivity assessment. This assessment is recommended by the latest Japanese guideline (issued in December 2023) for Japanese phase 1 studies before participation in multi-regional clinical trials (MRCTs). To comprehensively understand characteristics and ethnic sensitivity of drugs that seem to have racial/ethnic differences in its disposition and response, we investigated 620 new molecular entities (NMEs) approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) between 2008 and 2023. Of those, only 6.5% (40 NMEs) reported racial/ethnic differences in the PK (5.0%), safety (1.6%), and/or efficacy (0.6%) in the FDA drug labeling, with only one NME (0.16%) having a clinically significant PK difference which requires a reduced starting dose in East Asian patients. Additionally, 4.4% of 620 NMEs reported differences in the pharmacogenetics for drug-metabolizing enzymes. The comprehensive evaluation of characteristics and ethnic sensitivity of 40 NMEs with racial/ethnic differences in the PK, safety, and/or efficacy indicated two key findings. First, participation in MRCTs from various regions as early as possible is much more important than conduct of an additional phase 1 study in a specific region/country. Second, more attention and deeper evaluation of Asian PK would be needed for drugs with low bioavailability in the overall drug development.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
Published
2025-06-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/jcph.70065
Primary Topic
Pharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of Characteristics and Ethnic Sensitivity for FDA‐Approved Drugs with Racial and Ethnic Differences in Pharmacokinetics, Safety, and Efficacy

Yusuke Tanetsugu, Kei Fukuhara, Chieko Muto, Norisuke Kawai et al.
The Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
Pharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism
article

Evaluation of Characteristics and Ethnic Sensitivity for FDA‐Approved Drugs with Racial and Ethnic Differences in Pharmacokinetics, Safety, and Efficacy

Yusuke Tanetsugu, Kei Fukuhara, Chieko Muto, Norisuke Kawai, Shinsuke Wada
article en

Abstract

Racial and ethnic differences in drug disposition and response may have a significant impact on its risk-benefit balance. Therefore, it is important to examine whether an investigational drug has characteristics that make the pharmacokinetics (PK), safety, and efficacy likely to be affected by intrinsic and extrinsic ethnic factors based on ethnic sensitivity assessment. This assessment is recommended by the latest Japanese guideline (issued in December 2023) for Japanese phase 1 studies before participation in multi-regional clinical trials (MRCTs). To comprehensively understand characteristics and ethnic sensitivity of drugs that seem to have racial/ethnic differences in its disposition and response, we investigated 620 new molecular entities (NMEs) approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) between 2008 and 2023. Of those, only 6.5% (40 NMEs) reported racial/ethnic differences in the PK (5.0%), safety (1.6%), and/or efficacy (0.6%) in the FDA drug labeling, with only one NME (0.16%) having a clinically significant PK difference which requires a reduced starting dose in East Asian patients. Additionally, 4.4% of 620 NMEs reported differences in the pharmacogenetics for drug-metabolizing enzymes. The comprehensive evaluation of characteristics and ethnic sensitivity of 40 NMEs with racial/ethnic differences in the PK, safety, and/or efficacy indicated two key findings. First, participation in MRCTs from various regions as early as possible is much more important than conduct of an additional phase 1 study in a specific region/country. Second, more attention and deeper evaluation of Asian PK would be needed for drugs with low bioavailability in the overall drug development.

The Journal of Clinical PharmacologyVol. 65(11)
Pfizer (Japan) (JP)
Pfizer
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 81%
Pharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.