The MBCRC Advocate Researcher Program (MARP): connecting advocates and researchers as collaborative partners in cancer research

Involving patient advocates as partners in cancer research improves research and provides favorable experiences for both the researcher and the advocate. Previous work demonstrates challenges to establishing relationships between researchers and advocates, including uncertainty about why the relationships are necessary, how to establish them, what to say, and how they should be structured. To overcome these challenges, we established the Metastatic Breast Cancer Research Conference (MBCRC) Advocate Researcher Program (MARP) at the MBCRC in 2023. We outline the approach to the program to serve as a model for others interested in performing similar activities and report findings from surveys to establish evidence about the value of these relationships. The program connected 21 pairs of researchers and advocates, and participants responded to surveys about their experience, largely describing positive outcomes. Our hope is that a program like this could be used at any cancer conference in the future as we continue to encourage advocates and researchers to work together.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
npj Breast Cancer
Published
2025-06-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41523-025-00771-6
Primary Topic
Mental Health and Patient Involvement
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The MBCRC Advocate Researcher Program (MARP): connecting advocates and researchers as collaborative partners in cancer research

Steffi Oesterreich, Alana L. Welm, Janice Cowden, Josh J. Newby et al.
npj Breast Cancer
Mental Health and Patient Involvement
article

The MBCRC Advocate Researcher Program (MARP): connecting advocates and researchers as collaborative partners in cancer research

Steffi Oesterreich, Alana L. Welm, Janice Cowden, Josh J. Newby, P. V. Viswanath, J. James Mancuso, Christine Hodgdon, Stephanie Walker, Isaac S. Chan, Adrian V. Lee, Hillary S. Andrews, Gloria V. Echeverria, Kelly Shanahan, Katherine E. Pendleton, Igor Bado, Julia Maués, Michelle M. Williams, Bill Gates, Bob Riter, Garhett L. Wyatt, Debbie Denardi, Michael Papanicolaou, Anh M. Tran-Huynh, Marybeth Gilliam
article en

Abstract

Involving patient advocates as partners in cancer research improves research and provides favorable experiences for both the researcher and the advocate. Previous work demonstrates challenges to establishing relationships between researchers and advocates, including uncertainty about why the relationships are necessary, how to establish them, what to say, and how they should be structured. To overcome these challenges, we established the Metastatic Breast Cancer Research Conference (MBCRC) Advocate Researcher Program (MARP) at the MBCRC in 2023. We outline the approach to the program to serve as a model for others interested in performing similar activities and report findings from surveys to establish evidence about the value of these relationships. The program connected 21 pairs of researchers and advocates, and participants responded to surveys about their experience, largely describing positive outcomes. Our hope is that a program like this could be used at any cancer conference in the future as we continue to encourage advocates and researchers to work together.

npj Breast CancerVol. 11(1)
Albert Einstein College of Medicine (US), University of Pittsburgh (US), Baylor College of Medicine (US), Breast Cancer Research Foundation (US), University of Utah (US), Huntsman Cancer Institute (US), Lake Tahoe Community College (US), Global and Regional Asperger Syndrome Partnership (US), Cancer Research Institute of the Slovak Academy of Sciences (SK), Patient Advocate Foundation (US), Procter & Gamble (United States) (US), Friends of Cancer Research (US), The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (US), Texas A&M University (US), Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (US)
American Association of University Women
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
Mental Health and Patient Involvement
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.