Australia's national laws for worker psychological health: a policy evaluation and psychosocial safety climate analysis

• A multi-study evaluation showing psychological health work health and safety (WHS) regulations in Australia increased organisational Psychosocial Safety Climate (PSC). • Study 1 uses expert reports (2021-2024) from 19 countries to confirm Australia’s increased legislative focus on work-related psychological health. • Study 2 is a quasi-experimental study using national data sets to show significant increases in PSC in jurisdictions. • Study 3 is a longitudinal sector study that shows sustained improvement in PSC and reductions in psychological distress following the introduction of the new WHS regulations. Improving workers’ psychological health is an international priority. This multi-study policy evaluation research integrates institutional and organisational theory to determine if—and why—the introduction of enhanced pro-worker psychological health law (Work Health and Safety [WHS] Regulations) within a country (Australia) can lead to impact in organisations within jurisdictions (i.e., regions) and industry sectors. We assess organisational impact via changes in Psychosocial Safety Climate (PSC), which captures perceptions of the organisational safety system for worker psychological health, as well as worker psychological distress. Study 1 explores the international legal context, using expert reports from 19 countries to assess national work-related psychological health law development between 2021 and 2024. Results verify that Australia had an increased legislative work-related psychological health focus. Study 2, a quasi-experimental design, using large national data sets, compared jurisdictions within which the national law was implemented in 2023 (Legislated group) or not (Comparison group). Significant group-by-time interaction effects were found for PSC, aligning with expectations whereby PSC increased significantly in the Legislated group. Study 3, a longitudinal field experimental study explored the reach of the legal changes in a specific industry sector (university). With three-waves of data (n = 339), comparing universities across different jurisdictions, a group-by-time interaction was found for PSC and psychological distress. Findings show a positive impact of targeted psychosocial law on organisations’ safety system and workers’ health. The current study provides a theory-driven framework for evaluating and explaining legislated policy effects—across jurisdictions and within sectors—showing it can be a wide-reaching lever for improving work conditions and psychological health in the longer term.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Safety Science
Published
2025-06-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2025.106899
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Workplace Health and Well-being
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.45

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Australia's national laws for worker psychological health: a policy evaluation and psychosocial safety climate analysis

Rachael Potter, May Young Loh, Sharon K. Parker, Ali Afsharian et al.
3 citations
Safety Science
Workplace Health and Well-being
8.45
article

Australia's national laws for worker psychological health: a policy evaluation and psychosocial safety climate analysis

Rachael Potter, May Young Loh, Sharon K. Parker, Ali Afsharian, Maureen F. Dollard, Ross Iles, Daniel Neser, Ashira Friebel
article en
3 citations

Abstract

• A multi-study evaluation showing psychological health work health and safety (WHS) regulations in Australia increased organisational Psychosocial Safety Climate (PSC). • Study 1 uses expert reports (2021-2024) from 19 countries to confirm Australia’s increased legislative focus on work-related psychological health. • Study 2 is a quasi-experimental study using national data sets to show significant increases in PSC in jurisdictions. • Study 3 is a longitudinal sector study that shows sustained improvement in PSC and reductions in psychological distress following the introduction of the new WHS regulations. Improving workers’ psychological health is an international priority. This multi-study policy evaluation research integrates institutional and organisational theory to determine if—and why—the introduction of enhanced pro-worker psychological health law (Work Health and Safety [WHS] Regulations) within a country (Australia) can lead to impact in organisations within jurisdictions (i.e., regions) and industry sectors. We assess organisational impact via changes in Psychosocial Safety Climate (PSC), which captures perceptions of the organisational safety system for worker psychological health, as well as worker psychological distress. Study 1 explores the international legal context, using expert reports from 19 countries to assess national work-related psychological health law development between 2021 and 2024. Results verify that Australia had an increased legislative work-related psychological health focus. Study 2, a quasi-experimental design, using large national data sets, compared jurisdictions within which the national law was implemented in 2023 (Legislated group) or not (Comparison group). Significant group-by-time interaction effects were found for PSC, aligning with expectations whereby PSC increased significantly in the Legislated group. Study 3, a longitudinal field experimental study explored the reach of the legal changes in a specific industry sector (university). With three-waves of data (n = 339), comparing universities across different jurisdictions, a group-by-time interaction was found for PSC and psychological distress. Findings show a positive impact of targeted psychosocial law on organisations’ safety system and workers’ health. The current study provides a theory-driven framework for evaluating and explaining legislated policy effects—across jurisdictions and within sectors—showing it can be a wide-reaching lever for improving work conditions and psychological health in the longer term.

Safety ScienceVol. 191
University of Nottingham (GB), University of South Australia (AU), Curtin University (AU), Monash Health (AU), Monash University (AU)
Australian Research Council
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Workplace Health and Well-being
8.45
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.