Farmers’ learning preferences and risk management choices

Purpose: The relation between farmers’ learning preferences and risk management (RM) decision-making remains largely unexplored. We assess whether and how different learning preferences, notably learning by doing, from other farmers and through social media, influence farmers’ RM choices. Design/Methodology/Approach: Based on a survey of 320 farmers in Spain and the UK, we employed Poisson models with instrument variables to assess the effect of learning preferences on the level of diversification of RM portfolios, and Multivariate Probit Regressions to assess the effect on single strategies. Findings: We found that all learning preferences are significantly correlated to RM choice, with learning through social media and from peers leading to more diversified RM portfolios and learning by doing leading to less diversified ones. Moreover, the results show that each learning preference affects different specific RM strategies. Practical implications: Policies could leverage informal learning channels, especially learning through social media and from others that tend to more diversified RM portfolios. Yet, our results are limited in that other (formal) learning modalities that might play a relevant role were not accounted for in the analysis. Theoretical implications: The learning factor should be formalised and accounted for in theoretical frameworks modelling RM decision-making. Originality: The paper proposes theoretical advances to encompass the learning factor into RM decision-making frameworks and provides the first empirical evidence of the interaction between the three learning preferences and RM behaviour.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension
Published
2025-06-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/1389224x.2025.2513267
Primary Topic
Agricultural Innovations and Practices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Farmers’ learning preferences and risk management choices

Julie Urquhart, Daniele Bertolozzi-Caredio, Mauro Vigani, Bárbara Soriano
The Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension
Agricultural Innovations and Practices
article

Farmers’ learning preferences and risk management choices

Julie Urquhart, Daniele Bertolozzi-Caredio, Mauro Vigani, Bárbara Soriano
article en

Abstract

Purpose: The relation between farmers’ learning preferences and risk management (RM) decision-making remains largely unexplored. We assess whether and how different learning preferences, notably learning by doing, from other farmers and through social media, influence farmers’ RM choices. Design/Methodology/Approach: Based on a survey of 320 farmers in Spain and the UK, we employed Poisson models with instrument variables to assess the effect of learning preferences on the level of diversification of RM portfolios, and Multivariate Probit Regressions to assess the effect on single strategies. Findings: We found that all learning preferences are significantly correlated to RM choice, with learning through social media and from peers leading to more diversified RM portfolios and learning by doing leading to less diversified ones. Moreover, the results show that each learning preference affects different specific RM strategies. Practical implications: Policies could leverage informal learning channels, especially learning through social media and from others that tend to more diversified RM portfolios. Yet, our results are limited in that other (formal) learning modalities that might play a relevant role were not accounted for in the analysis. Theoretical implications: The learning factor should be formalised and accounted for in theoretical frameworks modelling RM decision-making. Originality: The paper proposes theoretical advances to encompass the learning factor into RM decision-making frameworks and provides the first empirical evidence of the interaction between the three learning preferences and RM behaviour.

The Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension
University of Gloucestershire (GB), European Commission (BE), Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (ES)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Agricultural Innovations and Practices
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Farmers’ learning preferences and risk management choices — Julie Urquhart, Daniele Bertolozzi-Caredio, et al. · The Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS