How to Fix a Broken Health Care System: Pathways to Maximize Health and Well-being for All

The U.S. health care system is broken, with particularly low performance for health outcomes, access to care, equity, and administrative efficiency in comparison with other high-income countries, despite high cost. By virtue of the many elements required for optimal care, the poor diabetes care quality and outcome metrics of the U.S. are canaries in the coal mine for the health care system. The fundamental problem with the U.S. health care system is that it does not prioritize the long-term health and well-being of all individuals and communities. Three intertwined elements are foundational for an understanding of why the U.S. health care system is built the way it is and what changes are necessary to improve it: 1) ethics and culture; 2) political economy, the underlying political and economic structures that shape our nation and thus our health system; and 3) the definition and measurement of value in health care. This article recommends that health care policies around health insurance and payment be designed to support, incentivize, and sustain effective population health models that address medical, social, psychological, and behavioral needs of all individuals and communities. Good governance is essential to assure that payer and provider market incentives are explicitly aligned to prioritize the health and well-being of individuals and communities and cost-effectiveness of care, beyond short-term financial gain for health care systems and investors. Equitable access allows for health care resource distribution according to need, enabling all individuals to have a fair and just opportunity for health.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Diabetes Care
Published
2025-06-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2337/dci25-0001
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Healthcare Policy and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.13

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How to Fix a Broken Health Care System: Pathways to Maximize Health and Well-being for All

Monica E. Peek, Joseph Dov Bruch, Elbert S. Huang, Marshall H. Chin et al.
1 citations
Diabetes Care
Healthcare Policy and Management
3.13
article

How to Fix a Broken Health Care System: Pathways to Maximize Health and Well-being for All

Monica E. Peek, Joseph Dov Bruch, Elbert S. Huang, Marshall H. Chin, Colleen M. Grogan, Harold A. Pollack, Namratha R. Kandula, David D. Kim
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The U.S. health care system is broken, with particularly low performance for health outcomes, access to care, equity, and administrative efficiency in comparison with other high-income countries, despite high cost. By virtue of the many elements required for optimal care, the poor diabetes care quality and outcome metrics of the U.S. are canaries in the coal mine for the health care system. The fundamental problem with the U.S. health care system is that it does not prioritize the long-term health and well-being of all individuals and communities. Three intertwined elements are foundational for an understanding of why the U.S. health care system is built the way it is and what changes are necessary to improve it: 1) ethics and culture; 2) political economy, the underlying political and economic structures that shape our nation and thus our health system; and 3) the definition and measurement of value in health care. This article recommends that health care policies around health insurance and payment be designed to support, incentivize, and sustain effective population health models that address medical, social, psychological, and behavioral needs of all individuals and communities. Good governance is essential to assure that payer and provider market incentives are explicitly aligned to prioritize the health and well-being of individuals and communities and cost-effectiveness of care, beyond short-term financial gain for health care systems and investors. Equitable access allows for health care resource distribution according to need, enabling all individuals to have a fair and just opportunity for health.

Diabetes CareVol. 49(1)
Northwestern University (US), Chicago Department of Public Health (US), University of Chicago (US)
Alfred P. Sloan Foundation, American Heart Association, Bristol-Myers Squibb, U.S. Social Security Administration, AcademyHealth, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute, Sutter Health, Arnold Ventures, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Health Resources and Services Administration, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Genentech, National Institute on Aging, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institute of Mental Health, National Institute on Drug Abuse, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Healthcare Policy and Management
3.13
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.