Statistical Hypothesis Test Approach Considering Workers’ Thermal Comfort to Determine Nonworking Days in Different Climate Zones

Construction duration is one of the three major elements in the construction industry, and accurate prediction is essential to minimize project variations stemming from inherent uncertainties. When evaluating construction duration, it is necessary to differentiate between working days and nonworking days, the latter influenced by holidays and weather conditions. While holidays are fixed, weather-related nonworking days introduce significant uncertainty due to varying climate characteristics, often evaluated using a single factor. This can lead to misestimation of nonworking days, increasing overall project uncertainties. Therefore, this study aims to propose a risk level based on outdoor thermal comfort and to provide nonworking day estimation criteria suitable for each climate zone. The study consists of three main phases: (1) data collection and classification from South Korea; (2) analysis of estimated risk levels considering outdoor thermal comfort; and (3) analysis of nonworking days by climate zone considering the estimated risk levels. The results of the study are as follows. When considering four different climate zones, the highest average number of nonworking days was observed for each zone as follows: Cfa (temperate climate with no dry season) (approximately 4.65 days, August), Cwa (temperate climate with dry winter) (approximately 3.92 days, August), Dfa (subarctic climate with no dry season) (approximately 4.61 days, August), and Dwa (subarctic climate with dry winter) (approximately 3.45 days, August). This study provides criteria for nonworking days specific to each climate zone in the construction industry, allowing for more accurate estimation of nonworking days by considering climate-specific characteristics. Furthermore, by comprehensively evaluating various weather conditions and incorporating worker safety levels, the results can serve as a quantitative index for establishing safety management measures. Finally, this study contributes to creating a safer working environment for workers by reducing construction accidents and mitigating delays due to weather-related nonworking days, thus preventing economic losses and protecting workers’ lives.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Published
2025-06-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1061/jcemd4.coeng-16481
Primary Topic
Building Energy and Comfort Optimization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Statistical Hypothesis Test Approach Considering Workers’ Thermal Comfort to Determine Nonworking Days in Different Climate Zones

Hyeongjun Mun, Jaewook Jeong, Jaemin Jeong, Louis Kumi
Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Building Energy and Comfort Optimization
article

Statistical Hypothesis Test Approach Considering Workers’ Thermal Comfort to Determine Nonworking Days in Different Climate Zones

Hyeongjun Mun, Jaewook Jeong, Jaemin Jeong, Louis Kumi
article en

Abstract

Construction duration is one of the three major elements in the construction industry, and accurate prediction is essential to minimize project variations stemming from inherent uncertainties. When evaluating construction duration, it is necessary to differentiate between working days and nonworking days, the latter influenced by holidays and weather conditions. While holidays are fixed, weather-related nonworking days introduce significant uncertainty due to varying climate characteristics, often evaluated using a single factor. This can lead to misestimation of nonworking days, increasing overall project uncertainties. Therefore, this study aims to propose a risk level based on outdoor thermal comfort and to provide nonworking day estimation criteria suitable for each climate zone. The study consists of three main phases: (1) data collection and classification from South Korea; (2) analysis of estimated risk levels considering outdoor thermal comfort; and (3) analysis of nonworking days by climate zone considering the estimated risk levels. The results of the study are as follows. When considering four different climate zones, the highest average number of nonworking days was observed for each zone as follows: Cfa (temperate climate with no dry season) (approximately 4.65 days, August), Cwa (temperate climate with dry winter) (approximately 3.92 days, August), Dfa (subarctic climate with no dry season) (approximately 4.61 days, August), and Dwa (subarctic climate with dry winter) (approximately 3.45 days, August). This study provides criteria for nonworking days specific to each climate zone in the construction industry, allowing for more accurate estimation of nonworking days by considering climate-specific characteristics. Furthermore, by comprehensively evaluating various weather conditions and incorporating worker safety levels, the results can serve as a quantitative index for establishing safety management measures. Finally, this study contributes to creating a safer working environment for workers by reducing construction accidents and mitigating delays due to weather-related nonworking days, thus preventing economic losses and protecting workers’ lives.

Journal of Construction Engineering and ManagementVol. 151(9)
Seoul National University of Science and Technology (KR), University of Toronto (CA)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 85%
Building Energy and Comfort Optimization
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.